Abstract
The effects of cryogenic and air blast freezing techniques on catfish fillet quality during frozen storage was evaluated. Fresh channel catfish fillets were cryogenically frozen by liquid carbon-dioxide using a pilot plant size cabinet type cryogenic freezer (CF) and by air blast (BF) frozen to −21 °C, separately. Freezing time (FT), freezing rate (FR), and energy removal rate (ERR) for freezing depend on the freezing techniques, which affect energy consumption and frozen seafood quality. The frozen fillets were stored at −20 °C and analyzed for weight loss, relative moisture loss, color, and lipid oxidation (Thiobarbituric acid; TBA) after 1-day, 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months of storage. Triplicate experiments were conducted and data were statistically analyzed at α = 0.05. FT for cryogenic freezing and air blast freezing were 19.3, and 55.1 min, respectively. Cryogenic freezing had higher FR (1.29 °C/min) and ERR (10.62 J/s) than BF (0.46 °C/min and 3.38 J/s, respectively). The cryogenically frozen catfish fillets had a lower freezing loss than fillets frozen by air blast freezing. TBA (mg MDA/kg sample) of the fillets frozen by CF was 0.94 which was lower than BF (1.25). The study demonstrated that catfish fillets cryogenically frozen had better quality characteristics than blast frozen catfish fillets after 6-months of storage.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have