Abstract

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac arrhythmia that affects approximately 2% of the overall population. Guidelines suggest the use of anti-arrhythmic agents as initial therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, however using cryoablation as a first line therapy might have increased efficacy. The safety and efficacy of cryoablation as initial therapy has not yet been established. Purpose We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the use of cryoballoon catheter ablation compared to anti-arrhythmic therapy as an initial intervention to prevent recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with atrial fibrillation. We also wanted to determine if using this initial ablative approach did not present increased adverse events. Methods A comprehensive search of multiple databases was performed to find randomized control trials that directly compared cryoablation therapy versus anti-arrhythmic therapy as initial treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation. A total of three RCTs met the inclusion criteria (724 patients) and were used in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome of our meta-analysis was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias. The secondary outcome evaluated serious adverse events of each therapy. Results The results showed a statistically significant reduction of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmic events in patients receiving cryoablation compared to anti-arrhythmic therapy [Risk Ratio (RR): 0.60, 95% CI (0.49, 0.72), P<0.ehab724.03521, I2=0%]. There was no significant difference in serious adverse events between patients receiving cryoablation compared to patients receiving anti-arrhythmic therapy. [Risk Ratio (RR): 1.19, 95% CI (0.71, 2.00), P=0.52, I2=0%]. Conclusion Our meta-analysis showed that cryoablation therapy as an initial therapy is more efficacious than anti-arrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation without an increased risk of serious adverse events. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call