Abstract
We propose that the choice between presenting a single victim or a group of victims in a charity ad should take into consideration the facial expression of the victim(s), entitativity, and the victim story, since these visual and verbal cues affect donors’ emotional responses and their perceived outcome efficacy, which have an impact on charitable giving behaviors. Four experiments are conducted. When a happy facial expression is presented, an ad showing a group of victims is found to be more persuasive than the same ad showing a single victim. When a sad facial expression is presented, an ad showing a single victim is more persuasive (vs. a group of victims). When presenting a group of happy-faced victims, we observe the advantageous effects of entitativity: high-entitativity (vs. low-entitativity) enhances people’s willingness to donate. However, no such differences between high- and low-entitativity are found when the ads present a group of sad-faced victims. When a victim story is included in the ad (i.e. a narrative ad), different versions of the ad are similarly persuasive regardless of victim image and facial expression. Non-profits and for-profit companies can maximize the success of their charitable campaigns by choosing the right victim image that suits their visual-verbal combination.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
