Abstract

Abstract Sands are known to crush under stresses at high confinement. Particle crushing is more predominant under shear stresses than under isotropic compression. Stresses in soil under deep foundations often reach the range where crushing becomes significant. Calcareous sands crush more readily than terrigenous quartzitic sands. Calcareous sands occur as skeletal remains of marine organisms and/or as nonskeletal oolites of calcareous material. Skeletal calcareous sand grains are characterized by the presence of intraparticle voids that increase the tendency of these sands to crush under stress. Presence of thin plate-like shell fragments further increases the crushability of calcareous sands. Deposits of calcareous sands are encountered extensively on the continental shelves lying between latitudes 30°N and 30°S. In many such marine areas, jacket-type offshore structures for oil production are being founded on calcareous sand strata – e.g., in the Arabian Sea offshore India, in the Bass Strait offshore Australia, and in the Persian Gulf offshore Saudi Arabia. The foundations of these structures consist of deep-penetration piles. These piles derive their axial load capacity from the skin friction resistance and the end bearing resistance offered by the soil strata they penetrate. Static pile load tests in calcareous sand strata have exhibited unusually low values of unit skin friction and unit end bearing capacity.1,2 It is believed that particle crushing that occurs during pile driving and static loading is one of the causes for the low pile capacity.2,3 For design of deep-penetration piles in calcareous sand strata, low values of limiting unit skin friction and limiting unit end bearing capacity currently are adopted in comparison to those being used for terrigenous quartzitic sands.3 To arrive at a rational design practice for piles in calcareous sands, one must begin by (1) identifying a method for quantitatively expressing the the sands' propensity to crush, (2) determining the extent of crushing of different types of calcareous sands in comparison to terrigenous sands, and (3) isolating the influence of crushing on shear behavior, which partly controls the end bearing and skin friction offered by such sands. This paper describes the results of an experimental investigation designed to achieve these three objectives and, in part, offers an explanation for the low skin friction and end bearing values in field tests.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.