Abstract
This article presents an interdisciplinary study of physical and social psychological effects on crowd dynamics based on a series of bottleneck experiments. Bottlenecks are of particular interest for applications such as crowd management and design of emergency routes because they limit the performance of a facility. In addition to previous work on the dynamics within the bottleneck, this study focuses on the dynamics in front of the bottleneck, more specifically, at entrances. The experimental set-up simulates an entrance scenario to a concert consisting of an entrance gate (serving as bottleneck) and a corridor formed by barriers. The parameters examined are the corridor width, degree of motivation and priming of the social norm of queuing. The analysis is based on head trajectories and questionnaires. We show that the density of persons per square metre depends on motivation and also increases continuously with increasing corridor width, meaning that a density reduction can be achieved by a reduction of space. In comparison to other corridor widths observed, the narrowest corridor is rated as being fairer, more comfortable and as showing less unfair behaviour. Pushing behaviour is seen as ambivalent: it is rated as unfair and listed as a strategy for faster access.
Highlights
Bottlenecks occur for a variety of reasons and fulfil different functions
Trains and buses, doors or narrow corridors or aisles are necessary for static, technical or economic reasons. As they limit the performance of a facility or a process and cause congestions, they are of special interest for applications such as crowd management, design of emergency routes and science
These can be categorized according to factors related to the spatial structure of the bottleneck and factors related to physiological and psychological characteristics of the people passing through the bottleneck as well as social dynamics in a crowd
Summary
Bottlenecks occur for a variety of reasons and fulfil different functions. When an event or protected area is entered, bottlenecks are used for access or ticket control and security checks. Trains and buses, doors or narrow corridors or aisles are necessary for static, technical or economic reasons As they limit the performance of a facility or a process and cause congestions, they are of special interest for applications such as crowd management, design of emergency routes and science. While most studies focus on the flow through the bottleneck, only a few examine the situation in front of it [18,19,20,21] This interdisciplinary paper addresses physical as well as social psychological effects on crowd dynamics, both within the bottleneck and in front of it. It is based on a previous experimental and questionnaire study [18] but more systematically examines corridor width, motivation and social norms
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.