Abstract
To achieve the desirable funding target in a crowdfunding campaign, the project creator needs to accurately anticipate the pledging behaviors of contributors with practical cognitive limitations. In this paper, we present a study on how the contributors’ cognitive bounded rationality affects the creator’s campaign decisions. Specifically, we consider a two-stage crowdfunding model, where a creator first announces the project decisions (i.e., price and the minimum number of required contributors), and then the contributors choose their pledging behaviors (whether and how to contribute) as they arrive stochastically. We consider the cognitive hierarchy model, where contributors are classified into different levels according to their capability of anticipating other contributors’ behaviors. Surprisingly, we show that the cognitive limitation may improve the chance of project success, especially when the crowdfunding target is high. We prove that with a high average contributor cognitive level, a low funding target, and a low difficulty of motivating the lowest cognitive level contributors, the creator can achieve a close-to-optimal revenue by simply assuming that contributors are fully rational. Otherwise, ignoring the contributors’ cognitive limitations can lead to a significant revenue loss.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.