Abstract

Background: Previous research has demonstrated cross-national variation in domain-life satisfaction relationships, with neither health, family, social life, personal safety, financial situation, home life or job satisfaction being universal predictors of wellbeing. The largest limitation of this previous research was a lack of appropriate control variables. Past research has shown that personality traits are powerful predictors of wellbeing, with three particularly important constructs being self-esteem, optimism and self-efficacy. Aims: The present study examined whether after controlling for positive personality traits, domain-life satisfaction relationships would vary cross-nationally and whether a direct cross-national comparison of domain-life satisfaction would reveal significant differences. It was predicted that the cross-national differences would be smaller than those found using more countries with greater cross-cultural differences. Methods: These hypotheses were tested using an online survey with samples from the USA and India, recruited using Mechanical Turk. Results: Both hypotheses were supported in that there was cross-national variation in domain-life satisfaction relationships, even after controlling for positive personality traits. In the Indian sample, health, financial and job satisfaction predicted life satisfaction. Amongst Americans, family, social life, financial situation and home satisfaction predicted it. Direct comparison revealed significant differences in the predictive power of home and job satisfaction, supporting the second hypothesis. As expected, the differences noted in this study were smaller than those revealed through our analysis of the World Values Scale and Eurobarometer. Conclusions: Domain life satisfaction relationships vary cross-nationally, even when personality traits are controlled.

Highlights

  • Obesity is described as an epidemic in a substantial proportion of the world and probably the greatest threat to long term health that exists (Reiband et al, 2020; Reilly and Kelly, 2010)

  • The aim of the current study was to explore the relationship between mindful eating, self-compassion, healthy / unhealthy weight, eating disorder and wellbeing in a sample of university students Methods: An online survey using questionnaire data collection in a sample of 349 students (105 males and 244 females)

  • The final analysis used one-way Analysis of Variance (Anova) to test for mean differences on wellbeing, eating attitudes, mindful eating and self-compassion in an attempt to explore the lack of relationship between body mass index (BMI) raw scores and these variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Obesity is described as an epidemic in a substantial proportion of the world and probably the greatest threat to long term health that exists (Reiband et al, 2020; Reilly and Kelly, 2010). Self-compassion can reduce the likelihood of an individual engaging in unhealthy eating behaviours (as the result of becoming overwhelmed by negative thoughts and feeling) through encouragement of a non-judgmental and balanced view of self (Albertson et al, 2014). It would appear that the relationship between self-compassion and mindful eating might be a fruitful avenue to explore (Mantzios et al, 2018) In particular how they might influence both healthy / unhealthy eating and eating disorders. The aim of the current study was to explore the relationship between mindful eating, self-compassion, healthy / unhealthy weight, eating disorder and wellbeing in a sample of university students

Materials
Procedure
Ethics
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call