Abstract

It is well established that statistical learning of visual target locations in relation to constantly positioned visual distractors facilitates visual search. In the present study, we investigated whether such a contextual-cueing effect would also work crossmodally, from touch onto vision. Participants responded to the orientation of a visual target singleton presented among seven homogenous visual distractors. Four tactile stimuli, two to different fingers of each hand, were presented either simultaneously with or prior to the visual stimuli. The identity of the stimulated fingers provided the crossmodal context cue: in half of the trials, a given visual target location was consistently paired with a given tactile configuration. The visual stimuli were presented above the unseen fingers, ensuring spatial correspondence between vision and touch. We found no evidence of crossmodal contextual cueing when the two sets of items (tactile, visual) were presented simultaneously (Experiment 1). However, a reliable crossmodal effect emerged when the tactile distractors preceded the onset of visual stimuli 700 ms (Experiment 2). But crossmodal cueing disappeared again when, after an initial learning phase, participants flipped their hands, making the tactile distractors appear at different positions in external space while their somatotopic positions remained unchanged (Experiment 3). In all experiments, participants were unable to explicitly discriminate learned from novel multisensory arrays. These findings indicate that search-facilitating context memory can be established across vision and touch. However, in order to guide visual search, the (predictive) tactile configurations must be remapped from their initial somatotopic into a common external representational format.

Highlights

  • It is well established that statistical learning of visual target locations in relation to constantly positioned visual distractors facilitates visual search

  • A repeatedmeasures analysis of variance (ANOVA) of individuals’ mean RTs with the factors Configuration and Epoch (1–5) only revealed a significant main effect of Epoch, F(4, 44) = 4.06, p = .007, ηp2 = .27: there was a linear decrease in RTs as the experiment progressed (1704, 1614, 1517, 1478, 1486 ms for Epochs 1 to 5; F(1, 11) = 7.33, p = .02, ηp2 = .40)

  • On the assumption that crossmodal contextual cueing requires a common, external frame, the beneficial effects of the consistently positioned tactile distractors in the search for a visual target may become measurable only when observers have sufficient preview time of the distractor arrangement, permitting the distractors’ coordinates to be remapped into an external reference frame

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is well established that statistical learning of visual target locations in relation to constantly positioned visual distractors facilitates visual search. While most studies of contextual cueing focused on the visual modality, Assumpção and collaborators went on to examine spatial context learning in the tactile modality (Assumpção, Shi, Zang, Müller, & Geyer, 2015, 2018) They devised a novel tactile search task in which four tactile stimuli were presented on a given trial, to two out of four possible fingers of each hand (no stimuli were presented to the thumbs). The spatial arrangements of the target and distractor fingers were held constant across trials, whereas the arrangements were generated anew on each trial in the non-predictive condition With this novel task, Assumpção et al (2015) established a tactile contextualcueing effect, indicating that similar statistical-learning mechanisms are at work in tactile as in visual search

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call