Abstract
The main objective of this work is to improve the energy-efficiency (EE) of a multiple access channel (MAC) system, through power control, in a distributed manner. In contrast with many existing works on energy-efficient power control, which ignore the possible presence of a queue at the transmitter, we consider a new generalized cross-layer EE metric. This approach is relevant when the transmitters have a non-zero energy cost even when the radiated power is zero and takes into account the presence of a finite packet buffer and packet arrival at the transmitter. As the Nash equilibrium (NE) is an energy-inefficient solution, the present work aims at overcoming this deficit by improving the global energy-efficiency. Indeed, as the considered system has multiple agencies each with their own interest, the performance metric reflecting the individual interest of each decision maker is the global energy-efficiency defined then as the sum over individual energy-efficiencies. Repeated games (RG) are investigated through the study of two dynamic games (finite RG and discounted RG), whose equilibrium is defined when introducing a new operating point (OP), Pareto-dominating the NE and relying only on individual channel state information (CSI). Accordingly, closed-form expressions of the minimum number of stages of the game for finite RG (FRG) and the maximum discount factor of the discounted RG (DRG) were established. The cross-layer model in the RG formulation leads to achieving a shorter minimum number of stages in the FRG even for higher number of users. In addition, the social welfare (sum of utilities) in the DRG decreases slightly with the cross-layer model when the number of users increases while it is reduced considerably with the Goodman model. Finally, we show that in real systems with random packet arrivals, the cross-layer power control algorithm outperforms the Goodman algorithm.
Highlights
1.1 Motivation The design and management of green wireless networks [1,2,3] has become increasingly important for modern wireless networks, in particular, to manage operating costs
This approach is important since it takes into account: (1) a fixed cost in terms of power namely, a cost which does not depend on the radiated power and (2) the presence of a finite packet buffer and sporadic packet arrival at the transmitter
For each packet arrival rate, we plot the social welfare with the cross-layer approach and the social welfare with the cross-layer power control but when
Summary
1.1 Motivation The design and management of green wireless networks [1,2,3] has become increasingly important for modern wireless networks, in particular, to manage operating costs. Futuristic (beyond 5G) cellular networks face the dual challenges of being able to respond to the explosion of data rates and to manage network energy. Several of the above described systems have some common features: 1. Multiple transmitters connected to a common receiver. Mhiri et al EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:257. 2. Lack of centralization or coordination, i.e., a distributed and decentralized network. 3. Relevance of minimizing energy consumption or maximizing energy efficiency (EE)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.