Abstract

Microfiltration of a double-chain cationic surfactant, dioctadecyldimethylammonium chloride, in water has been studied using 1 or 0.2 μm track-etched polycarbonate membranes. A computer-controlled filter rig was used, in which the process conditions of crossflow velocity u, transmembrane pressure drop Δ p and temperature T were changed independently. In addition, permeate flux J and in some cases surfactant concentration in the feed c f and permeate c p , were monitored during filtration. The effects of process and material variables on the permeate flux decay, steady-state permeate flux J ∞ and the permeate surfactant concentration were assessed. It was found that fouling of the membrane by surfactant is very rapid (within tens of seconds) although high crossflow veclocity, large memebrane pore size and low feed surfactant concentration reduced the rate of surfactant deposition. Steay-state permeate flux increases significantly with crossflow velocity provided the surfactant is in a rigid chain (gel) lamellar dispersion state ( T < 48°C). The steady-state permeate flux J ∞ decays linearly with ln ( c f ) provided the feed concentration is less than the so-called gel concentration ( c g ) which is obtained by extrapolating the linear portion of the curves J ∞ vs ln ( c f ) so that c f = c g when J ∞ 0. Although the gel concentration, which is independent of pore size and the process variables, is found to be 20 gl −1, experiments conducted at feed concentration well above c g still yield a reasonable permeate flux, albeit at a reduced level. Surfactant rejection studies indicate that 0.2 μm membranes yield lower rejection than 1 μm membranes while rejection is greater at 30°C than at 60°C. Other process variables do not have any significant influence on rejection. The effectiveness of a membrane and the processing conditions can be quantified by considering the variation of J ∞ with c p/c f . It is found that a 1 μm membrane is more effective than a 0.2 μm membrane, crossflow velocity increase the effectiveness of the process, and that temperature has no significant influence.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.