Abstract
This chapter argues that the differences between orthodox international legal and Ethiopian conceptions of sovereignty and civilisation were consistently lost in translation during Ethiopia’s diplomatic encounter with the League of Nations, and especially during the Crisis of 1935-36. In the first place, the conditions attached to Ethiopia’s membership of the League can be linked directly to an inability on the part of inter-war international law, as institutionalised in the League, to recognise and respect the existence of a specifically Ethiopian conception of sovereignty. Second, the Abyssinian conception of civilisation as a process of cultural transformation made it possible of Ethiopia to present itself as equal in cultural terms to European states, and inferior to them only in material – that is, developmental and hence rectifiable terms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.