Abstract
To gauge the relative efficacy of treatments, authors of review articles and commentary might attempt to compare results across clinical trials, but failure to recognize inherent differences across studies or apply proper statistical principles could yield flawed conclusions. Several approaches can mitigate the risks in these cross-trial comparisons.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
