Abstract

Abstract. We examine evolution of the cross-tail current during substorm current disruption/dipolarization using observations from two satellites in the near-Earth magnetotail at the downtail distances of 8–9 RE. By choosing times when these two satellites are separated, mainly in the north–south distance in the tail current sheet, precise determination of current density in the layer embedded between these satellites can be obtained with Ampère's law. Two such events are examined and several common features are found. The current densities in the layer embedded by the two satellites were reduced by ~ 40–70% during substorm dipolarization. The changes in current densities have the fast kinetic timescale, i.e., in seconds, implying a kinetic process for current disruption/dipolarization. The estimated power within the current layer was mainly dissipative in the dawn–dusk direction and mainly dynamo in the Sun–tail direction that is needed to drive the north–south substorm current system in the ionosphere. Remote sensing of the energization site with the ion sounding technique shows that the energization site was initially earthward of the satellite and moved down the tail at later times. Breakdown of the frozen-in condition occurred intermittently during the disturbance interval. These features provide important clues to the substorm onset process.

Highlights

  • Model DGeevoeslocipemnteifnictimddieisntnuetricbinaaclnlocyne-tisrnosivntreutrhmtiebelnmyteathdgenseMapttroeotolalpiidatleges(aAatlilnooDgnGnegdeleoitrvhpeoeoecusttialloocoilnsipa,eox2mfni0ss0tteuio8bfn)ids.ctetoTtrehmreapogees of these five satellites line up once Devisecruyss4iondsays.ArdeilssetpuaasrbecsaenipcsleathswmeaassppaohcreiegnidonimastleulynrbocanonntchceaetkivneexodhwifnbroiatmssHiamevsypouudlblussrttiioovorenlmoeo.ngfTeyrahguiys-andoTnhIernseeahiarnveneceearnpptoragoretbieecssleah,taL∼vuei2a(02p0oa1gn1ede)∼sexa3taH0m∼Ryin1Ede0.drRomElaowgghnieylteictawfinoelddouotberrvoierawleddisapslaaypsrointotthyepepooflamr arnegyiiomnp(uAlskiavseoefvue, n1Et9s6ain4r)tt.hhIet piSslanysmoswatemsinertvhaetinoenasr-oEfaartshubresgtoiormn universe

  • It was inferred that the particle energization site associated with current disruption/dipolarization (CDD) approached the satellite from the earthward–dawnward direction at the neutral sheet based on the observed anisotropy of energetic ions with the application of the ion sounding technique

  • THEMIS data used in this study are magnetic field from the fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) (Auster et al, 2008), electric field from the electric field instrument (EFI) (Bonnell et al, 2008), plasma parameters and distribution functions from the Electrostatic Analyzer (ESA) (McFadden et al, 2008), and energetic particle fluxes from the Solid State Telescope (SST) (Angelopoulos, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Model DGeevoeslocipemnteifnictimddieisntnuetricbinaaclnlocyne-tisrnosivntreutrhmtiebelnmyteathdgenseMapttroeotolalpiidatleges(aAatlilnooDgnGnegdeleoitrvhpeoeoecusttialloocoilnsipa,eox2mfni0ss0tteuio8bfn)ids.ctetoTtrehmreapogees of these five satellites line up once Devisecruyss4iondsays. The current densities in the near-Earth region during the current disruption/dipolarization (CDD) interval were found to vary in a timescale of seconds. It was inferred that the particle energization site associated with CDD approached the satellite from the earthward–dawnward direction at the neutral sheet based on the observed anisotropy of energetic ions with the application of the ion sounding technique. The substorm onset location was earthward of ∼ 8 RE in the near-Earth region, consistent with the current disruption substorm paradigm. We first provide additional confirmation that the observed anisotropy of energetic ions in the event reported by Lui (2011) is genuinely due to remote sensing of energization site and not due to plasma flow. The amount of dissipation/dynamo power in that CDD event is presented. Another CDD event from THEMIS observations is presented here to show that the results obtained earlier are not unique to just one event

Observations
Summary and discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call