Abstract
The WTO system has largely achieved procedural fairness, yet substantial challenges persist in addressing the equity of legal remedies and enforcement, particularly amid significant disparities in economic power among member states. Such power imbalances necessitate a nuanced consideration in the design of the system to ensure that fairness transcends procedural aspects and reflects in substantive outcomes. In that context, Intellectual Property (IP) retaliation emerges as an innovative and temporary method to address these imbalances, offering a mechanism to level the playing field between developed and developing countries. While IP retaliation has gained traction as a strategic tool to mitigate power disparities, its mechanisms remain inadequately defined and require further empirical validation and refinement in practice. This highlights the need for ongoing reform within the WTO system to enhance both the clarity and effectiveness of IP retaliation, ensuring it serves as a viable and fair recourse in international trade disputes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.