Abstract

Mobile technologies promote computer-assisted language learning (CALL) while mobile applications, being learner-oriented by design, provide a powerful founding to build individual self-paced environments for language study. Mobile CALL (MALL) tools are able to offer new educational contexts and fix, at least, partially, the problems of previous generations of CALL software. Nonetheless, mobile technologies alone are not able to respond to CALL challenges without cooperation and interaction with language theory and pedagogy. To facilitate and formalize this interaction several criteria sets for CALL software has been worked out in recent years. That is why an approach based on using mobile devices is a natural way to transfer the learning process from teaching-centered classroom to a process, which is oriented to individual learners and groups of learners with better emphasis on supporting individual learning styles, user collaboration and different teaching strategies. Pronunciation teaching technology in one of areas, where the automated speech processing algorithms and corresponding software meet the problems of practical phonology. Computer-assisted prosody teaching (CAPT), a sub-domain of CALL, is a relatively new topic of interest for computer scientists and software developers. Present-day advancement of mobile CAPT tools is supported by evolutionary processes in the theory of language learning and teaching. This paper explores language–technology relations using a case of StudyIntonation – a cross-platform multi-functional mobile CAPT tool based on a digital processing core for speech processing, visualization and estimation developed by the authors. We particularly address the problems of developing CAPT evaluation frameworks. To define the problematic points of the project and understand the directions for future work, we discuss an approach to formalized evaluation using a set of CAPT-specific criteria drawing attention to such evaluation factors as general descriptive information, instructional purposes, functionality, usability, and presentation.

Highlights

  • Mobile technologies for language study have gained much attention in recent years for their potential benefits for teachers and learners

  • Computer assisted language learning (CALL) tools developed for mobile devices (MALL) have strongly promoted their popularity due to the ability to foster a stress-free and self-paced learning environment, virtually unlimited input, and rich multimodal feedback [1]

  • That is why an approach based on using mobile devices is a natural way to transfer the learning process from teachingcentered classrooms to a process oriented to both individual learners and groups of learners with better emphasis on supporting individual learning styles and strategies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mobile technologies for language study have gained much attention in recent years for their potential benefits for teachers and learners. Mobile language learning tools can provide a private and flexible environment for self-study The latter issue is important for pronunciation learning, which is not mere acquisition of a new different phonological system, but mastering a complex cognitive skill of an individual [10]. Informal, contextual, and ubiquitous learning environment, in which it is possible for students to control their learning and receive diverse multimodal authentic input with tailored instructive feedback is highly motivating [11] Students raise their awareness to improve pronunciation, become more conscious about their faculty of language and acquire a better understanding of many phonological features of a foreign language [1]. In [27] a checklist of criteria for CAPT software, websites, and mobile apps is proposed; a question-based instrument in [5] evaluates to what extent the software programs teach pronunciation in accordance with the principles of the communicative approach [28]. Based on the recent new release of StudyIntonation CAPT software [29], [30], [31], in this paper we discus the results of its screening [32] against the criteria from [27], in order to evaluate StudyIntonation functionality and disclose the limitations of its design

Method
Cross-Platform Implementation and DSP Core Assessment
Criteria Evaluation and Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call