Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of five two-step SYBR Green RT-qPCR kits and five one-step SYBR Green qRT-PCR kits using real-time PCR assays. Two real-time thermocyclers showing different throughput capacities were used. The analysed performance evaluation criteria included the generation of standard curve, reaction efficiency, analytical sensitivity, intra- and interassay repeatability as well as the costs and the practicability of kits, and thermocycling times. We found that the optimised one-step PCR assays had a higher detection sensitivity than the optimised two-step assays regardless of the machine used, while no difference was detected in reaction efficiency, R 2 values, and intra- and interreproducibility between the two methods. The limit of detection at the 95% confidence level varied between 15 to 981 copies/µL and 41 to 171 for one-step kits and two-step kits, respectively. Of the ten kits tested, the most efficient kit was the Quantitect SYBR Green qRT-PCR with a limit of detection at 95% of confidence of 20 and 22 copies/µL on the thermocyclers Rotor gene Q MDx and MX3005P, respectively. The study demonstrated the pivotal influence of the thermocycler on PCR performance for the detection of rabies RNA, as well as that of the master mixes.

Highlights

  • Rabies, which is caused by all members of the genus Lyssavirus, family Rhabdoviridae, is a viral encephalitis that is found on every continent except Antarctica

  • This study evaluates the performance of five two-step SYBR Green reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR kits and five one-step SYBR Green qRT-PCR kits using real-time PCR assays

  • In Europe, bat rabies is caused by four lyssaviruses, namely, European bat Lyssavirus type 1 (EBLV-1), European bat Lyssavirus type 2 (EBLV-2), Bokeloh bat Lyssavirus (BBLV), and Lleida bat Lyssavirus (LLEBV)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rabies, which is caused by all members of the genus Lyssavirus, family Rhabdoviridae, is a viral encephalitis that is found on every continent except Antarctica. The conventional methods are reported to be very sensitive when using a heminested RT-PCR [8] and compared to heminested RT-PCR, real-time PCR is shown to be about 100– 1,000-fold more sensitive [9]. Due to this high PCR sensitivity, which engenders a risk of sample cross contamination and a risk of potential false positive results, RTPCR is not recommended by the World Health Organization for routine postmortem diagnosis of rabies in animals [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call