Abstract

J. P. Rushton has done research indicating that predominantly black nations have higher rates of violent crime than predominantly white nations, which have higher rates than predominantly Asian nations. He attributes these differences to constitutional, inheritable factors on which the races vary. This article discusses the numerous problems with Rushton's use of international crime data and analysis, foremost of which are his use of one‐way analysis of variance and lack of consideration of other causes of variation. Regression analysis‐including dummy race variables and other relevant explanatory variables‐indicates no significant association between race and cross‐national homicide rates, the best and probably only valid indicator of cross‐national variation in violent crime. This is the case whether reanalyzing Rush‐ton's data or analyzing properly adjusted, inspected, and selected homicide rates.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.