Abstract

Allografts can be rejected either through the antibody-mediated or cellular pathways. The objective of this study was to look at the extent of antibody formation in patients awaiting re-keratoplasty using cross-matches on cadaver retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. Cadaver RPE cells were derived by trypsin digestion from donor eyes (n = 1200). After 3 days of cell cultivation, the cells were adherent and began to lose their pigment. By day 7 most cells were clear and grew as a polygonal monolayer. MHC class I expression by RPE cells was studied by the W6/32 (anti-HLA-A, B, C) monoclonal antibody (MoAb) and that of class II (HLA-DR) by the 136 MoAb. Normal RPE cells express few class I and no detectable class II antigens. For the induction of MHC expression, cells were subsequently stimulated with 250 U/ml of recombinant gamma-interferon for 5 days. Cells were used for tissue typing and also for cross-matches with recipient serum. Cross-matches were subsequently performed and measured by flow cytometry. Both class I and class II antigens were strongly enhanced, as could be shown by immunohistochemical staining. Some 20% of those patients awaiting rekeratoplasty (n = 60) were positive for anti-HLA antibodies. In one case anti-DR3 antibodies were detected in a recipient who had had several rejection episodes after keratoplasty. RPE cells are not only useful for cadaver post-mortem HLA typing but also for donor-specific cross-matches. The degree of antibody formation after keratoplasty in rejecting patients was, however, low. This may imply that anti-HLA antibodies are not the major cause of corneal graft loss after keratoplasty.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.