Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how patterns of collaboration and scholarly independence are related to early stage researchers’ development in two multidisciplinary learning environments at a Swedish university. Based on interviews with leaders, supervisors, doctoral students, and post docs, results show how early stage researchers’ development is conditioned by their relative positions in time (career stage) and space (geographical and epistemic position). Through the theoretical notions of ‘epistemic living space’ and ‘developmental networks’, four ways of experiencing the multidisciplinary learning environment were distinguished. Overall, the environments provided a world of opportunities, where the epistemic living space entailed many possibilities for cross-disciplinary collaboration and development of scholarly independence among peers. However, depending on the members’ relative positions in time and space, this world became an alien world for the post docs who had been forced to become “over-independent” and find collaborators elsewhere. Moreover, it became an avoided world for absent mono-disciplinary supervisors and students who embodied “non-collective independence”, away from the environments’ community. By contrast, a joint world emerged for doctoral students located in the environment, which promoted their “independent positioning” and collaborative ambitions. Thus, early stage researchers’ collaboration and development of scholarly independence were optimised in a converged learning space, where the temporal and spatial conditions were integrated and equally conducive for learning. Based on these results, the authors provide suggestions for how to improve the integration of scholars who tend to develop away from the community because of their temporal and spatial positions.

Highlights

  • Before the 1990s, research across disciplinary boundaries was primarily initiated by academic interests, while it has become a political concern for addressing global challenges (Kessel and Rosenfield 2008; UNESCO 2019)

  • With reference to Jakobsen et al (2004), we suggest that interdisciplinary collaboration is unidirectional when the interaction is dominated by a single discipline, and goal-oriented when the interaction is driven by the identified issue rather than disciplinary hierarchies

  • We have shown how the multidisciplinary epistemic living space can be understood in different ways, depending on early stage researchers’ spatial and temporal positions, with consequences for their learning space

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Before the 1990s, research across disciplinary boundaries was primarily initiated by academic interests, while it has become a political concern for addressing global challenges (Kessel and Rosenfield 2008; UNESCO 2019). Numerous studies show that cross-disciplinary research is no easy road, since university structures, funding and publication avenues tend to be organised along disciplinary lines (Albert et al 2009; Lewis et al 2016; Turner et al 2015) Doctoral students in such settings face additional problems in having to form their scholarly identity without clear guiding principles (Boden et al 2011; Felt et al 2013). Focused studies on post docs’ learning in multidisciplinary environments are lacking, despite evidence suggesting that post docs need support from scientific supervisors and career mentors for their development (Scaffidi and Berman 2011) Against this background, we will in this study examine the learning conditions of doctoral students and post docs in two multidisciplinary research environments placed at the same Swedish research university. The current study draws on interviews with both early stage and senior researchers to analyse how patterns of collaboration and scholarly independence are related to the early stage researchers’ relative positions in time and space with respect to stage in their career paths, institutional position and physical location

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call