Abstract
AbstractUniversities are highly heterogeneous institutions and this diversity needs to be acknowledged when assessing their performance. Using an unbalanced panel that covers a 3-year period (2011–3) with 761 observations coming from 307 universities located in 8 European countries, this study examines the extent to which strategic choices regarding international positioning and scope determine how efficient universities are in the allocation of their internal resources. Three main groups of universities are identified, according to their internationalisation and scope: world-class, flagship, and regional. Next, we model universities’ objective function as a mix of teaching, research, and third mission endeavours, and calculate efficiency scores. A meta-frontier analysis based on data envelopment analysis is used. This approach allows comparing efficiency frontiers across groups and relative to a common frontier. Policy implications within and between groups are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
