Abstract

ABSTRACT Supermassive black hole masses (MBH) can dynamically be estimated with various methods and using different kinematic tracers. Different methods have only been cross-checked for a small number of galaxies and often show discrepancies. To understand these discrepancies, detailed cross-comparisons of additional galaxies are needed. We present the first part of our cross-comparison between stellar- and gas-based MBH estimates in the nearby fast-rotating early-type galaxy NGC 6958. The measurements presented here are based on ground-layer adaptive optics-assisted Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) science verification data at around 0${_{.}^{\prime\prime}}$6 spatial resolution. The spatial resolution is a key ingredient for the measurement and we provide a Gaussian parametrization of the adaptive optics-assisted point spread function for various wavelengths. From the MUSE data, we extracted the stellar kinematics and constructed dynamical models. Using an axisymmetric Schwarzschild technique, we measured an MBH of $(3.6^{+2.7}_{-2.4}) \times 10^8\,$M⊙ at 3σ significance taking kinematical and dynamical systematics (e.g. radially varying mass-to-light ratio) into account. We also added a dark halo, but our data do not allow us to constrain the dark matter fraction. Adding dark matter with an abundance matching prior results in a 25 per cent more massive black hole. Jeans anisotropic models return MBH of $(4.6^{+2.5}_{-2.7}) \times 10^8$ and $(8.6^{+0.8}_{-0.8}) \times 10^8\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$ at 3σ confidence for spherical and cylindrical alignments of the velocity ellipsoid, respectively. In a follow-up study, we will compare the stellar-based MBH with those from cold and warm gas tracers, which will provide additional constraints for the MBH for NGC 6958, and insights into assumptions that lead to potential systematic uncertainty.

Highlights

  • The developments in astronomical instrumentation over the last two decades have substantially improved the capability of astronomical observations: remarkably, it is possible to robustly measure the mass of supermassive black holes (SMBH) in nearby galaxies with a precision of less than a factor of two using a variety of different methods

  • The spatial resolution is a key ingredient for the measurement and we provide a Gaussian parametrisation of the adaptive optics-assisted point spread function (PSF) for various wavelengths

  • We used Gaussian line-of-sight velocity distribution (LOSVD) for the ionised gas kinematics and LOSVDs parametrised as Gauss-Hermite polynomials up to the order of 6 for the stellar kinematics extraction

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The developments in astronomical instrumentation over the last two decades have substantially improved the capability of astronomical observations: remarkably, it is possible to robustly measure the mass of supermassive black holes (SMBH) in nearby galaxies with a precision of less than a factor of two using a variety of different methods (e.g., review by Kormendy & Ho 2013). The origin of these discrepancies cannot be pinned down because different methods, assumptions, and wavelength ranges are used for different tracers, which probe the gravitational potential in different ways. The inhomogeneity of the mass measurements and the lownumber statistics make it challenging to quantify the effect of the different methods on the scatter in MBH scaling relations. We decided to perform this test by comparing the MBH derived with the widely applied techniques of using stars, ionised gas and molecular gas as tracers of the gravitational potential

MUSE integral field spectroscopic data
Imaging data
Spatial resolution in the GALACSI adaptive optics mode
Method Nucleus
Kinematics extraction
Mass model
Jeans anisotropic models
Systematic uncertainties of the measurement
Systematics in the stellar kinematics extraction
Systematics in the dynamical modeling
Systematics in the mass model
The infuence of dark matter
Findings
Black hole scaling relations
Summary of our results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call