Abstract

Sympathetic critics of world-system analysis contend that its systemic level of abstraction results in one-sided generalizations of systemic change. Unequal exchange theory and commodity chain analysis similarly reduce distinct and historical forms of labor and their interrelationships to common functional and ahistorical essences. This paper applies an incorporated comparisons method to give historical content to an understanding of unequal exchange and global inequality through a study of the Japan–US silk network’s formation and change during the mid 1880–1890s. Analysis of unequal exchange processes requires, in this case, an examination of the mutual integration and transformation of distinct labor and value forms —peasant sericulture, ?lature wage-labor, and industrial silk factory wage-labor—and the infundibular market forces they structured. These relations were decisively conditioned by new landlordism and debt-peonage, class-patriarchy, state mediations, migration, and by peasant and worker struggles against deteriorating conditions. Indeed, the transitional nature of the silk network’s formation, which concluded the Tokugawa system and decisively contributed to Japan’s emergence as a nation-state of the capitalist world-economy, was signi?ed by the very last millenarian and quasi-modern peasant uprising in 1884 among indebted sericulturists, the very ?rst recorded factory strikes in 1885–86, by women raw silk reelers in K?fu, and by strikes among unionizing workers in patriarchal and mechanized silk factories in Paterson, New Jersey, 1885–86 (Boles 1996, 1998). The “local” conditions of each con?ict were molded by the interdependence of those conditions that constituted a formative part of the world-system and its development. In the face of struggles and intensifying world-market competition, Japanese and US manufacturers took opposite spatial strategies of regional expansion to overcome the structural constraints of existing labor forms and relations. Analysis of the silk network permits the interconnections among seemingly disparate events and forms of collective protest within historical networks to be understood, revealing the world-historical dimensions of local developments and, conversely, the local faces of global inequality.

Highlights

  • CRITIQUES OF WORLD SYSTEMS ANALYSISWorld-Systems progenitor Immanuel Wallerstein is among the acclaimed social scientists of the th century, having initially developed an enormously simplifying yet complex analysis of capitalism as a historical social system as expounded in a multi-volume set of sophisticated historical works and in collections of essays that abound with insights (Wallerstein, )

  • The body of this paper offers a study of the Japan–US silk network as an example of an alternative approach, but one that does not aspire to the same lofty goals as world-systems analysis

  • The Chichibu rebellion was the imbrication of local social relations and customs, the reconstitution of ideas and forms of struggle on new terrain shaped by national mediations and the worldscale processes and forces of the Japan–US silk network in the world-economy

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

World-Systems progenitor Immanuel Wallerstein is among the acclaimed social scientists of the th century, having initially developed an enormously simplifying yet complex analysis of capitalism as a historical social system as expounded in a multi-volume set of sophisticated historical works and in collections of essays that abound with insights (Wallerstein , , , , , , , , ). The concepts of “surplus”,“surplus product”,“value”,“surplus value”, “profit,” are used interchangeably in world-systems analysis precisely because differences in form are made secondary and minor (e.g. Wallerstein : – ) This perspective cannot theoretically grasp the self-expansion of capital through the value form as a defining characteristic of industrial wage-labor, nor the value relationships specific to the class relationships of other production forms. How disparities arise through the relations among value forms with distinct capital-labor relations, and how prices diverge from values in interstate markets as consequent to the very integration of different forms of production of axial commodity chains, still remains a theoretical mystery in world-systems literature Both unequal exchange and commodity chain analysis have neglected the study of the historical forms of labor and their interrelations in the division of labor. The expansion and profits of mechanized silk production in the US was based on greater productivity and labor exploitation within US silk factories (the appropriation of greater and greater surplus value), but this enabled the expropriation of value subsidies from inputs as manifest in the low price of raw silk, which was fully valorized, along side surplus value, at the point of sale in the consumer market

Paterson’s Gendered Centralization and Decentralization
Class-Patriarchal Relations of the Japanese Reeling Industry
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call