Abstract
Critiques of Serbian Civil Code of 1844 were presented in this paper. Namely, Serbian Code was not an original work, but rather abridged version of Austrian Civil Code (Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch). Critics objected to author of the Code Jovan Hadžić that he took himself too much liberty in his redaction work, so that some provisions become unclear. Hadžić was also criticized for very difficult language and style of codification and sometimes inaccurate legal terminology. But mostly Hadžić was criticized for miscomprehension of the legal nature of so - called zadruga (extended family, common among South Slavs), product of customary law. The entire institute of zadruga was regulated rather superficially, so that sometimes it was considered as a legal entity and sometimes as a condominium. Therefore, critiques of the provisions on zadruga were particularly examined in this paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.