Abstract
The article deals with the question of applicability limits of the Value Theory in cultural studies and validity limits of contemporary value-based consciousness. This limit is set by differentiating between the Good and the Value; the difference was clear to ancient Greek and medieval philosophers, and the necessity of acknowledging which is returning to the philosophy today. The Good exists independently, it is a source of life and, therefore, supposes gratitude; values and evaluation come into question when “there is choice and its declination, when it is up to us to choose between action and inaction”. But the fact is that collective consciousness is now dominated by axiological rationality. Gnoseologically, the characteristic of this rationality is the substitution of the classical idea of truth by evaluation. Contemporary philosophy sees the question of how these or those Values emerge as a field of the critical analysis. No prominent school of philosophical thought places critical importance on Values, but Values are regarded as derivatives from various foundations: interests of a social class or a group, structures of the unconscious, language or communication logic, the nature of human existence, the sense of being. Consequently, axiological reason is seen as mythologically “naive”, which is also a reverse side and a victim of cynical reason. Theories, that attempt to define Values as foundations of the culture, reflect naivety of collective consciousness. Their major theoretical drawback is of the same nature: they oversee the difference between the Value and the Good. The author analyzes the essence of culture from the hermeneutical point of view, according to which culture is based on comprehension of meanings constituted by language, and Values are just what meanings manifest themselves through.
Highlights
The name of the article being suggested is a tribute to tradition
To be more exact – this work is about axiological rationality that dominates in contemporary culture and that, if not to focus on differentiation of reason (Vernunft in German) and understanding (Verstand in German), within the given context, I suggest to consider as a special synonym of practical rationality
The differentiation of the Good and the Value, that was so clear for consciousness in the times of Ancient Greece and Middle Ages, cannot be comprehended by a collective consciousness of the modern epoch – its bearer actively resists the situation when the thing that he/she considers to be the Value could be something different from the Good
Summary
To be more exact – this work is about axiological rationality that dominates in contemporary culture and that, if not to focus on differentiation of reason (Vernunft in German) and understanding (Verstand in German), within the given context, I suggest to consider as a special synonym of practical rationality This is the “rationality” that bases on specific judgments being named “phronesis” (φρόνησις) by Aristotle: “[mental] temper involved with the judgment, that is true and supposing actions that concern the human’s Goods” [as stated in Nicomachean Ethics], as well as “that concern the things connected with the activities when there is choice and evasion, whether doing something or not doing anything depends on us” [5 (NE, 1197а)]. The way of thinking in the values here and in all other things is superior sacrilege that can exist only with regards to the being” [2]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
