Abstract

ISEE-144 Introduction: In environmental and occupational settings, carcinogenic exposures are often repeated or protracted over time. The time pattern of exposure accrual may influence subsequent temporal patterns of cancer risk. Several simple models that may be used for temporal variation in exposure effects are presented. Methods: A cohort of 40,415 nuclear industry workers was identified via the Canadian National Dose Registry. Vital status and cause of death were ascertained through 1994. Associations between ionizing radiation and mortality due to lung cancer and leukaemia were quantified using conditional logistic regression models with risk sets constructed by incidence density sampling. A step function, a bilinear function, and a sigmoid function were used to evaluate variation in exposure effects with time-since-exposure and age-at-exposure. Results: Step and sigmoid functions were used to explore latency and morbidity periods. For analyses of lung cancer and leukaemia the best fitting models were obtained when exposure assignment was lagged by 13 and 0 years, respectively. A bilinear function was used to evaluate whether exposure effects diminished with time-since-exposure. There was evidence of attenuation of radiation effects with protracted time-since-exposure. In analyses of age at exposure, there was evidence of variation in radiation-mortality associations; discounting radiation doses accrued at younger ages (e.g. 15-35 years) led to significant improvements in model fit. Conclusions: This paper illustrates empirical approaches to evaluating temporal variation in the effect of a protracted exposure on disease risk.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call