Abstract

The theory of critical transitions and the theory of self-referential social systems are two well-established theories in the ecosystem and sociological research respectively. A dialogue between them may offer new insights on the complex articulation of the nature and society nexus in socio-environmental transformations. By means of the conceptual reconstruction of both theories and drawing on relevant literature of social-ecological research, in this article, I argue that systems theory can contribute to the theory of critical transitions with a robust concept of communication that accounts for the relevance of semantics and social structures, the production of communicative locks, and the identification of early warning signals of social-ecological transitions in communication. On the other hand, the theory of critical transitions provides systems theory with both a refined concept of crisis as critical transition and the technical tools for empirical research. The article concludes that the dialogue between the science of ecosystems and the science of society is not an intellectual exercise but a form of increasing the correspondence between social-ecological transitions and our explanations and interventions in this domain.

Highlights

  • One of the main problems in the sociological analysis of natural events consists in observing nature as an entity external to society; and one of the main problems of scientific research on natural dynamics consists in excluding or underrating the human factor from the equation

  • The performative effects of self-descriptions, the tendency of communication to engage in repetitive dynamics and feedback loops, and its capacity to provide both early warning signals of environmental problems and depictions of possible futures are crucial elements for refining our comprehension of social-ecological transitions

  • I have shown that social systems theory can obtain from the theory of critical transitions a sophisticated concept of crisis as a critical transition that offers both technical tools for empirical examination and theoretical elements for further developing a general approach to change in complex systems

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

One of the main problems in the sociological analysis of natural events consists in observing nature as an entity external to society; and one of the main problems of scientific research on natural dynamics consists in excluding or underrating the human factor from the equation. The convergence of ecological research, network science, graph theory, and the increased computational capacity for big data processing has enabled the empirical identification of dynamics and patterns that transcend the classical borders between nature, technology, and society, thereby allowing a proper mapping and understanding of the complex interrelationships between those domains Theories such as panarchy (Gunderson and Holling, 2002), resilience theory (Berkes et al, 2003; Folke, 2006; Folke et al, 2016), and the theory of critical transitions (Scheffer, 2009) have shown that complexity is not a hypothesis but a real dynamic web including objects, events, and meanings that historically and topologically connect with each other at different levels, intensities, and periodicities, sometimes cyclically, sometimes suddenly and explosively.

MARTEN SCHEFFER’S THEORETICAL LANDSCAPES
NIKLAS LUHMANN’S SYSTEMIC ENVIRONMENTS
DISCUSSION
Semantics and Social Structures
Locked-in Communication
Communication
Reframing Crises as Critical Transitions in Systems Theory
CONCLUSION
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call