Abstract

Under physiological conditions, CD4+ regulatory T (Treg) cells expressing the transcription factor Foxp3 are generated in the thymus [thymus-derived Foxp3+ Treg (tTregs) cells] and extrathymically at peripheral sites [peripherally induced Foxp3+ Treg (pTreg) cell], and both developmental subsets play non-redundant roles in maintaining self-tolerance throughout life. In addition, a variety of experimental in vitro and in vivo modalities can extrathymically elicit a Foxp3+ Treg cell phenotype in peripheral CD4+Foxp3− T cells, which has attracted much interest as an approach toward cell-based therapy in clinical settings of undesired immune responses. A particularly notable example is the in vitro induction of Foxp3 expression and Treg cell activity (iTreg cells) in initially naive CD4+Foxp3− T cells through T cell receptor (TCR) and IL-2R ligation, in the presence of exogenous TGF-β. Clinical application of Foxp3+ iTreg cells has been hampered by the fact that TGF-β-driven Foxp3 induction is not sufficient to fully recapitulate the epigenetic and transcriptional signature of in vivo induced Foxp3+ tTreg and pTreg cells, which includes the failure to imprint iTreg cells with stable Foxp3 expression. This hurdle can be potentially overcome by pharmacological interference with DNA methyltransferase activity and CpG methylation [e.g., by the cytosine nucleoside analog 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC)] to stabilize TGF-β-induced Foxp3 expression and to promote a Foxp3+ iTreg cell phenotype even in the absence of added TGF-β. However, the molecular mechanisms of 5-aza-dC-mediated Foxp3+ iTreg cell generation have remained incompletely understood. Here, we show that in the absence of exogenously added TGF-β and IL-2, efficient 5-aza-dC-mediated Foxp3+ iTreg cell generation from TCR-stimulated CD4+Foxp3− T cells is critically dependent on TGF-βR and IL-2R signaling and that this process is driven by TGF-β and IL-2, which could either be FCS derived or produced by T cells on TCR stimulation. Overall, these findings contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the process of Foxp3 induction and may provide a rational basis for generating phenotypically and functionally stable iTreg cells.

Highlights

  • Induced Foxp3+ Treg cells, which are generated from precommitted CD4+Foxp3−CD25+ Peripherally induced Foxp3+ Treg (pTreg) cell precursors [1, 2], comprise 20–40% of the mature Treg cell pool in steady-state mice [3] and act in concert with thymus-derived Foxp3+ Treg cells to enforce immune tolerance [3,4,5,6]

  • We provide evidence that in the absence of added TGF-β and IL-2, initiation of Foxp3 expression during 5-aza-dC-mediated Foxp3+ iTreg cell generation from T cell receptor (TCR)-stimulated, initially naive CD4+Foxp3− T cells critically depends on TGF-βR and IL-2R signaling, two signaling pathways with well-established roles in Foxp3+ iTreg cell generation in vitro and pTreg cell generation in vivo

  • Our data are consistent with the interpretation that 5-aza-dC initially facilitates stochastic Foxp3 induction by the enhancement of TGF-βR and IL-2R signaling under experimental conditions of limited TGF-β and IL-2 availability, elucidating an additional mode of action of 5-aza-dC beyond the direct modulation of CNS2 CpG methylation within the Foxp3 gene locus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Induced Foxp3+ Treg (pTreg) cells, which are generated from precommitted CD4+Foxp3−CD25+ pTreg cell precursors [1, 2], comprise 20–40% of the mature Treg cell pool in steady-state mice [3] and act in concert with thymus-derived Foxp3+ Treg cells (tTregs) to enforce immune tolerance [3,4,5,6]. After anti-Foxp mAbs and Foxp3-fluorochrome reporter mice became commonly available, numerous reports have extended the concept of TGF-β-/TCR-mediated Foxp3+ induction to truly naive CD4+Foxp3− T cells by rigorously excluding preformed Foxp3+ Treg cells These studies established that the process of TGF-β-/TCR-mediated Foxp3+ iTreg cell generation is strictly dependent on IL-2R signaling and IL-2, which could either be exogenously added or produced by TCR-stimulated CD4+ T cells [14]. TGF-β-mediated Foxp3+ iTreg cell generation in vitro fails to recapitulate the epigenetic [19,20,21,22,23] and transcriptional [24, 25] signature of in vivo generated Foxp3+ Treg cells, which is reflected by variable suppressor activity [26] and unstable Foxp expression [19, 20, 27], precluding the clinical use of TGF-β-induced Foxp3+ iTreg cells

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call