Abstract

Digital rock analysis (DRA) has exhibited strong ability and significant potential to help people to image geological microstructures and understand transport mechanisms in rocks underground, especially for unconventional reservoirs like tight sandstone and shale. More and more new technologies have been developed for higher resolutions, which always come with higher expense. However, the balance between cost (money and time) and benefit has never been figured out quantitatively for these studies. As the cost and benefit are directly related to image resolution and size, this work is focusing on whether there is a critical resolution and sample size when using DRA for accurate enough predictions of rock properties. By numerically changing the digital resolutions of the reconstructed structures from high-resolution micro-computed tomography (CT) scanned tight rock samples, it is found that the permeability predictions get stable when the resolution is higher than a cut-off resolution (COR). Different from physical rocks, the representative element volume (REV) of a digital rock is influenced by the digital resolution. The results of pore-scale modeling indicate that once sample size is larger than the critical sample size and the scan resolution higher than the critical resolution for a given rock, the predicted rock properties by DRA are accurate and representative.

Highlights

  • Digital rock analysis (DRA) has become a powerful tool for modeling transport in real rock samples that have been imaged with X-ray computed tomography (CT) or other three-dimensional

  • What is more important is that rock properties such as relative permeability can be predicted in weeks or less [2,3], which greatly saves time compared to laboratory core tests [4], especially for unconventional reservoirs

  • Though Borujeni et al [32] investigated the effect of mesh resolution on simple generated structures to separate the influence of image resolution and mesh resolution on permeability, none of other researchers considered this difference when computing transport properties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Digital rock analysis (DRA) has become a powerful tool for modeling transport in real rock samples that have been imaged with X-ray computed tomography (CT) or other three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques [1]. Though high resolution imaging gets digital rock almost the real one, the small sample size risks losing representativeness and the results can be useless. This means that it is never better to perform DRA with higher resolution in view of cost as well as benefit. Though Borujeni et al [32] investigated the effect of mesh resolution on simple generated structures to separate the influence of image resolution and mesh resolution on permeability, none of other researchers considered this difference when computing transport properties. To critically study the effect of resolution and the joint influence of sample size and resolution on performance of DRA to find a balance between cost and benefit, two tight sandstone samples from. After image resolution effect is well quantified, both effects of sample size and resolution are studied and the critical resolution and sample size are found

Materials and Methods
Structure Reconstruction Procedure
Procedure
Permeability
Case Set-Up
Extrapolation
This is valid whenwhen calculated changes linearly with mesh
Validation
3.3.Results
Sample
Critical Resolution and Sample Size
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call