Abstract
This article argues that a statistical analysis of Genesis sources performed by Cornelius B. Houk (published in JSOT 27.1 [2002]) turns out to have statistical and methodological flaws. The purpose of this response to Houk’s study is to describe the flaws and to offer some suggestions for avoiding them. Houk’s conclusions about Genesis sources are not supported by his data or method, but the method may deserve further study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
