Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the implications of applying critical realism to the study of organizational learning. It considers critical realism as an alternate theoretical science foundation to the domains of empirical realism and social constructivism that characterize most of the field of organizational learning. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts the approach of a philosophical/conceptual discussion. Findings This study finds that the critical realist approach makes it possible for organizational learning researchers to apply a prescriptive change agenda. It requires researchers to study the context in which organizational learning occurs. These two features enable the researcher to propose what the world must be like for organizational learning to occur. Hence, a critical realist foundation moves organizational learning theory a step closer to its theoretical sibling, the learning organization. Originality/value This study reveals the potential in applying critical realism to the study of organizational learning and identifies its related strengths.

Highlights

  • In the body of knowledge related to organizational learning, there are two clear science theoretical domains that stand out

  • This study reveals the potential in applying critical realism to the study of organizational learning and identifies its related strengths

  • Transitive and intransitive elements of organizational learning The components implementation strategy, contextual variables and the outputs and outcomes from Figure 1 can be transitively observed in the empirical domain, but even if not observed, they exist in the actual domain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the body of knowledge related to organizational learning, there are two clear science theoretical domains that stand out. The social constructivist tradition, which emanates from the classical work on communities of practice by Brown and Duguid (1991) and Lave and Wenger (1991), argues that learning is a context-dependent, situated process that occurs collectively between people (Elkjaer, 2004; Hernes and Irgens, 2012; Filstad, 2014). In this traditional knowledge is argued to

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call