Abstract

A sentence-reading test was devised in order to assess the aphasic's ability to detect errors in written discourse. One hundred pairs of sentences, each containing one correct and one erroneous sentence, were presented to the patients, who were required to locate the error in one of the two sentences. So that comprehension in the auditory and visual modalities might be compared, the identical test was administered orally to a subset of the aphasic population. Contrary to expectations, there was no difference in overall scores between patients with anterior and posterior pathology. Anterior patients performed somewhat better on the oral version, posterior patients on the written version of the test. Finally, an examination of errors revealed a regular order of difficulty in sentences which featured contradictions to "real-world" knowlege, irrespective of the locus of brain damage, while the order of difficulty of sentences featuring syntactic deviations differed appreciably, depending on the locus of lesion. An attempt is made to relate these findings to current experimental and clinical knowledge.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.