Abstract
The relationship between the critical micellization concentration (cmc) of a surfactant in solution and its free energy of micellization is probably the most widely used one in surfactant science. Until recently, most surfactants discussed in the literature were made up of one polar head group, nonionic or ionic, bonded to a single hydrophobic moiety. Recently, studies have been initiated on new types of ionic surfactants: bolaforms, surfactants with divalent counterions, gemini, or dimeric surfactants, etc. This paper first derives the relationship between the cmc and for a very general type of ionic surfactant, made up of a surfactant ion containing i polar groups of valency zs bonded to j alkyl chains, with counterions of valency zc. The form of this relationship is examined for several types of ionic surfactants. It is shown that many reported studies did not use the correct relationship to evaluate the free energy of micellization from the value of the cmc. In particular, the counterion contribution was often neglected, which resulted in large errors. The use of the correct equations is shown to yield values for the free energy of transfer of a methylene group from water to the micellar pseudophase which are largely independent of the surfactant chemical structure, as it is to be expected.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.