Abstract

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) aims to achieve “Good Environmental Status” (GES) in EU marine waters by 2020. This initiative started its first phase of implementation in 2012, when each member state defined the GES and environmental targets in relation to 11 descriptors and related indicators for 2020. In 2013, the EU Commission launched the reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), which aims to achieve biomass levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield (MSY) for all commercial stocks exploited in EU waters by 2020, as well as contribute to the achievement of GES. These two pieces of legislation are aligned since according to Descriptor 3 (commercial fish and shellfish), the MSFD requires reaching a healthy stock status with fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) compatible with the respective MSY reference limits for all commercial species by 2020. We investigated whether the two policies are effectively aligned in the Mediterranean Sea, an ecosystem where the vast majority of stocks show unsustainable exploitation. For this purpose, we assessed and compared the number and typology of stocks considered by the member states when assessing GES in relation to data on stocks potentially available according to the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF) and the proportion of landings they represented. The number of stocks considered by the member states per assessment area was uneven, ranging between 7 and 43, while the share of landings corresponding to the selected stocks ranged from 23% to 95%. A lack of coherence between GES definitions among the member states was also revealed, and environmental targets were less ambitious than MSFD and CFP requirements. This could possibly reduce the likelihood of achieving fishery sustainability in the Mediterranean by 2020. These conditions limited the envisaged synergies between the two policies and are discussed in consideration of the recent Commission Decision on criteria and methodological standards for GES.

Highlights

  • In 2008, the European Commission approved the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (Directive 2008/56/EC; MSFD; EU-COM, 2008), which was the new legislation put forward under the coordination of the EU Directorate-General for Environment aimed at achieving “Good Environmental Status” (GES) in EU waters by 2020

  • Most assessment areas were included in each geographical subregion except for the Strait of Sicily, for which the extension partially overlapped between the Western Mediterranean Sea (WMS) and Ionian Sea and the Central Mediterranean Sea (ISCM) subregions (Figure 1)

  • We analyzed and compared the approaches applied by EU Mediterranean member states in the early phases of the implementation of the MSFD in relation to commercial fisheries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2008, the European Commission approved the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (Directive 2008/56/EC; MSFD; EU-COM, 2008), which was the new legislation put forward under the coordination of the EU Directorate-General for Environment aimed at achieving “Good Environmental Status” (GES) in EU waters by 2020 This concept represents “the environmental status of marine waters where these provide ecologically diverse and dynamic oceans and seas which are clean, healthy, and productive” (Article 3; EU-COM, 2008). ); (iii) establishment of a series of environmental targets (ETs) and associated indicators” by July 15, 2012 (EU-COM, 2008) This assessment should have been done in the context of “waters, the seabed, and subsoil on the seaward side of the baseline from which the extent of territorial waters is measured extending to the outmost reach of the area where a Member State has and/or exercises jurisdictional rights, in accordance with the Unclos Member states were asked to coordinate with the other EU states and other countries with national waters within the same region or subregion using “existing regional institutional cooperation structures, including those under Regional Sea Conventions, covering that marine region or subregion” (Article 6.1; EU-COM, 2008)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call