Abstract

The Hardy–Littlewood inequalities for m-linear forms on $$\ell _{p}$$ spaces are known just for $$p>m$$. The critical case $$p=m$$ was overlooked for obvious technical reasons and, up to now, the only known estimate is the trivial one. In this paper we deal with this critical case of the Hardy–Littlewood inequality. More precisely, for all positive integers $$m\ge 2$$ we have $$\begin{aligned} \sup _{j_{1}}\left( \sum _{j_{2}=1}^{n}\left( \ldots \left( \sum _{j_{m}=1} ^{n}\left| T\left( e_{j_{1}},\ldots ,e_{j_{m}}\right) \right| ^{s_{m} }\right) ^{\frac{1}{s_{m}}\cdot s_{m-1}}\ldots \right) ^{\frac{1}{s_{3}}s_{2} }\right) ^{\frac{1}{s_{2}}}\le 2^{\frac{m-2}{2}}\left\| T\right\| \end{aligned}$$for all m-linear forms $$T{:}\,\ell _{m}^{n}\times \cdots \times \ell _{m} ^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb {K}=\mathbb {R}$$ or $$\mathbb {C}$$ with $$s_{k} =\frac{2m(m-1)}{mk-2k+2}$$ for all $$k=2,\ldots ,m$$ and for all positive integers n. As a corollary, for the classical case of bilinear forms investigated by Hardy and Littlewood in 1934 our result is sharp in a strong sense (both exponents and constants are optimal for real and complex scalars).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.