Abstract
We examine the percolation model on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ by an approach involving lattice animals and their surface-area-to-volume ratio. For $\beta \in [0,2(d-1))$, let $f(\beta)$ be the asymptotic exponential rate in the number of edges of the number of lattice animals containing the origin which have surface-area-to-volume ratio $\beta$. The function $f$ is bounded above by a function which may be written in an explicit form. For low values of $\beta$ ($\beta \leq 1/p_c - 1$), equality holds, as originally demonstrated by F. Delyon. For higher values ($\beta > 1/p_c - 1$), the inequality is strict. We introduce two critical exponents, one of which describes how quickly $f$ falls away from the explicit form as $\beta$ rises from $1/p_c - 1$, and the second of which describes how large clusters appear in the marginally subcritical regime of the percolation model. We demonstrate that the pair of exponents must satisfy certain inequalities. Other such inequalities yield sufficient conditions for the absence of an infinite cluster at the critical value (c.f. [4]). The first exponent is related to one of a more conventional nature in the scaling theory of percolation, that of correlation size. In deriving this relation, we find that there are two possible behaviours, depending on the value of the first exponent, for the typical surface-area-to-volume ratio of an unusually large cluster in the marginally subcritical regime.
Highlights
We examine the percolation model by an approach involving lattice animals, divided according to their surface-area-to-volume ratio
Throughout, we work with the bond percolation model in Zd
For any given p ∈ (0, 1), two lattice animals with given size are likely to arise as the cluster C(0) containing the origin provided that they have the same surface-area-to-volume ratio
Summary
We examine the percolation model by an approach involving lattice animals, divided according to their surface-area-to-volume ratio. The first main result, Theorem 3.4, is proved: the inequalities λ < 1/2 and ςλ < 1 cannot both be satisfied In outline, this is because λ < 1/2 implies that, for values of p just less than pc, most of the weight in the sum in (2) is carried by terms indexed by m >> nα + n1/2, while ς < 1/λ implies that the limiting function f (β) has dropped enough in this range of β = m/n that the probability of such lattice animals is decaying quickly: we have reached beyond the low side of the critical scaling window. It would be of much interest further to understand the relation of λ and ς to other exponents
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.