Abstract
Safety Tip of the Month| August 2020 Critical Event Debriefing ASA Monitor August 2020, Vol. 84, 13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.M99.0000695128.46328.c6 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Search Site Citation Critical Event Debriefing. ASA Monitor 2020; 84:13 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.M99.0000695128.46328.c6 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll PublicationsASA Monitor Search Advanced Search Topics: debriefing Critical event debriefing is valued in medicine for its role in education and learning (JAMA 2014;312:2333-4; Anesthesiology 2014;120:160-171; Circulation 2018;138:e82-e122; Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1063-9), quality assurance (Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:e25), multidisciplinary team training (Ann Surg 2014;259:403-10), and many other domains. It has also been embraced by other high-stakes industries (Cureus 6: e174). Perioperative critical events (such as massive hemorrhage, anaphylaxis, or cardiac arrest) can be both rare to the individual provider and common (in aggregate) across large health systems (N Engl J Med 2013;368:246-53). This combination only adds to the potential impact these events can have on perioperative teams. A growing body of research suggests that only a fraction of actual perioperative critical events are followed by any form of debriefing (Anesthesiology 2019;130:1039-48). While the barriers to debriefing can vary (e.g., production pressure, limited... You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
