Abstract

Paint technology, namely paint preparation and application procedures, is an important aspect of painting traditions. With the expansion of archaeometric studies and in situ non-destructive analytical methods, a renewal of technological studies is being observed in rock art. In situ analyses have several limitations that are widely discussed in the literature, however. It is not yet clear whether they provide accurate information on paint technology, except under certain conditions. Here, we evaluated digital microscopic and pXRF in situ analyses for the characterisation of a large set of red and yellow paintings from the El Castillo cave, Cantabria, Spain. We have set experiments and used statistical methods to identify differences between paint components and determine factors impacting pXRF measurements. We found that the compositional heterogeneity of the paintings' environment, especially variations in secondary deposits, was responsible for most of the differences observed between the pXRF signals recorded on the paintings. We concluded that the El Castillo cave environment is not suitable for non-destructive technological studies, but that more favourable contexts might exist. Following previous works and our own results, we advocate a combination of both in situ and laboratory invasive analyses for the study of paint composition and paint technology. Our research protocol, based on the comparison of rock paintings, their substrate, experimental paintings and Fe-normalisation of the signals can improve the reliability of pXRF results. We also propose to include more systematic characterisation of rock wall heterogeneity and the use of microscopic analyses in non-destructive approaches.

Highlights

  • Palaeolithic rock art is a key feature of human evolution, providing information on humans’ language, abstract thoughts, symbolic behaviour, ontological world and social organisation

  • In-situ analyses performed with portable X-ray fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy equipment are becoming widespread for the study of paint materials and painting techniques

  • The first problematic result we obtained from the El Castillo portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) analyses was a systematic relationship between the variations in Ca content and the overall intensity of the signal (PCA1, raw spectral data): higher Ca peak intensity corresponded to lower overall spectra intensity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Palaeolithic rock art is a key feature of human evolution, providing information on humans’ language, abstract thoughts, symbolic behaviour, ontological world and social organisation. In-situ analyses performed with portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) and Raman spectroscopy equipment are becoming widespread for the study of paint materials and painting techniques. They allow the paintings to be conserved, unlike more conventional laboratory analyses requiring sampling. The pictorial mixture might be more or less viscous, depending on the way it is prepared [4] In this regard, the choice of the binder is an important parameter. The choice of one influence the choice of the other They are highly influenced by a society’s overall technical and symbolic systems (e.g. use of the same binder for different purposes) and the way in which the painter has been taught to mix and apply the paint. The cultural logic driving the “chaîne opératoire” [76] may play a key role in the final appearance of the painting

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call