Abstract

Abstract Porphyry Cu, and porphyry Cu-Au deposits, are associated with arc magmatism and their ore-forming systems generally follow the magmatic evolution of typical arcs. However, most arc magmas are barren and giant economic porphyry Cu ± Au deposits are rare. In this study, we model variations in rare earth element concentrations in the evolving arc magmas and giant porphyry Cu ± Au systems to quantify the percentage of the fractionating minerals required to produce the observed changes. We find that, during the andesitic stage of fractionation, ore-forming systems in thick crusts fractionate ~35% more amphibole than an average of thick arc magma systems (the thick-crust reference suite) and that ore-forming systems in thin crusts fractionate twice as much amphibole as their equivalent thin-arc magma reference suite. Thick-crust ore-forming suites also fractionate ~50% less plagioclase, and thin-crust ore systems ~40% less plagioclase, than their associated reference suites during the same andesitic stage of fractionation. Taken together, these observations imply that ore-producing magmas are appreciably wetter than their associated barren reference suites. Our modelling also shows that 80% more amphibole is required to reproduce the andesite stage of fractionation in the thick-crust reference suite than in its thin-crust equivalent, suggesting that magmas produced under thick crusts are wetter than those produced under thin crusts. On the other hand, the chalcophile element contents of the thick- and thin-crust ore-forming systems are similar to and higher than those of the thick- and thin-crust reference suites, respectively. Therefore, we suggest that the high water content plays a critical role in the formation of giant porphyry Cu ore in thick crusts, whereas both high chalcophile contents and high water contents are required to form giant porphyry Cu-Au deposits in thin crusts. The high fraction of amphibole fractionation in giant economic porphyry suites, compared with their relevant reference suites, results in lower Y in the ore-associated suites and this difference increases with fractionation. As a consequence, plots of Y against MgO can be used to identify porphyries that have economic potential and are preferred to Sr/Y plots because they are less affected by the intense alteration associated with giant porphyry Cu ± Au deposits.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.