Abstract

During the current SARS‐CoV‐2 and tuberculosis global pandemics, public health and infection prevention and control professionals wrestle with cost‐effective means to control airborne transmission. One technology recommended by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization for lowering indoor concentration of these and other microorganisms and viruses is upper‐room ultraviolet 254 nm (UVC254) systems. Applying both a material balance as well as some nondimensional parameters developed by Rudnick and First, the impact of several critical parameters and their effect on the fraction of microorganisms surviving UVC254 exposure was evaluated. Vertical airspeed showed a large impact at velocities <0.05 m s−1 but a lesser effect at velocities >0.05 m s−1. In addition, the efficacy of any upper‐room UVC system is influenced greatly by the mean room fluence rate as opposed to a simple volume‐ or area‐based dosing criteria. An alternative UVC254 dosing strategy was developed based on the fluence rate as a function of the UVC254 luminaire output (W) and the square root of the product of the room volume and the ceiling height.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call