Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites

Abstract

Objective: With the move to virtual interviewing, residency websites are an important recruitment resource, introducing applicants to programs across the country and allowing for comparison. Recruitment is highly competitive from a common potential pool between vascular surgery, thoracic surgery and interventional radiology with the ratio of applicants to positions being highest in interventional radiology, followed by thoracic surgery and lastly vascular surgery, as reported by the National Resident Matching Program. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accessibility and availability of online content for those integrated residency programs. Methods: A list of accredited vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology residencies was obtained from the ACGME. Program websites were evaluated by trained independent reviewers (n=2) for content items pertaining to program recruitment and education (scored absent or present). Statistical analysis was performed in R software. Results: Of ACGME accredited programs, 56 of 61 (92%) vascular surgery, 27 of 27 (100%) thoracic surgery, and 74 of 85 (87%) interventional radiology programs had functional websites (P=0.122). Vascular surgery websites contained a median of 26 content items (IQR: 20, 32), thoracic surgery websites contained a median of 27 content items (IQR: 21, 32), and interventional radiology websites contained a median of 23 content items (IQR: 18, 27). Two content items considered highly influential to applicant program decision are procedural experience and faculty mentorship, were reported at 32% and 11% for vascular surgery, 19% and 11% for thoracic surgery, and 50% and 15% for interventional radiology (P=0.008 and P=0.751, respectively). Key deficits were work hours, debt management and curriculum for interventional radiology; resident profiles, sample contracts, and research interests in vascular surgery; operative experiences, program director contact and message for thoracic surgery. Interventional radiology deficits were work hours and thoracic surgery deficits were procedural experience. Both IR and CT websites lacked information in evaluation criteria and faculty mentorship. Conclusions: This study has uncovered key differences in availability of online content for residencies recruiting from the same pool of applicants. Thoracic surgery has the most information, followed by vascular surgery, with interventional radiology reporting the least content. In the era of virtual interviewing from the same potential pool of applicants, programs should review and revise their web presence with the aim to increase the availability of online content in order to attract valuable candidates.