Critical choices in cleft surgery: 18-year single-surgeon retrospective review of 900 cases

Abstract

Multidisciplinary management of orofacial clefts may lead to a successful treatment outcome. However, it is quite usual that lack of long-term treatment planning and collaboration among various specialists and lack of standardized surgical protocols result in poor esthetic and functional treatment outcomes. This article aims to hypothesize some critical determinants of outcome in cleft surgery. Throughout a period of 18 years, 900 patients with different clinical types of congenital cleft anomaly were subject to primary repair of cleft lip, nose, and palate by single surgeon using various procedures, including preoperative nasoalveolar molding, two-stage and one-stage repair of complete cleft lip and palate, two-flap and one-flap palatoplasty, open tip rhinoplasty, and postoperative nasal molding. Clinical results of preoperative nasoalveolar molding and surgical repair of lip, nose, and palate were satisfactory for most patients, parents, and surgeon panel. Treatment based on the individual patient’s facial assets and deficits must be the controlling factor in designing therapy. The essential key to successful management of clefts is to figure out the three-dimensional dynamics that govern the deformity and to recognize a fourth dimension for time along these dynamics in order to envision how a small difference in the position of a single suture during the first surgery can bring about a giant deformity upon completion of facial growth, hence the crucial role of the first surgery and its related concepts, techniques, and tactics in dictating the final outcome of the case. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.