Abstract
Classical transfer path analysis (TPA) is a widely used and reliable method for tackling noise and vibration problems. But due to its complexity and time-consuming procedure the industry is constantly seeking for simpler and faster methods. One such method, often referred to as operational path analysis (OPA), was presented in 2006 and has quickly gained popularity in the NVH field. The method works with measured operational input and output accelerations and sound pressures and the transmissibilities calculated from these. The claim for its accuracy is based on being able to reproduce the original output signal by summing the calculated partial contributions but it has not yet been compared to other TPA methods. This new method is now critically examined and compared to a reliable classical TPA measurement. The results of this examination reveal three significant weaknesses. This paper deals with the effect of the cross-coupling between the input signals. Due to modal behavior a single force will cause vibrations at all inputs. Thus, there is not a simple one-to-one relationship between loads and inputs. This coupling then can easily lead to false identification of significant paths in case of the OPA method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.