Critical assessment of chromatographic metadata in publicly available metabolomics data repositories

Abstract

IntroductionThe structural identification of metabolites represents one of the current bottlenecks in non-targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) based metabolomics. The Metabolomics Standard Initiative has developed a multilevel system to report confidence in metabolite identification, which involves the use of MS, MS/MS and orthogonal data. Limitations due to similar or same fragmentation pattern (e.g. isomeric compounds) can be overcome by the additional orthogonal information of the retention time (RT), since it is a system property that is different for each chromatographic setup.ObjectivesIn contrast to MS data, sharing of RT data is not as widespread. The quality of data and its (re-)useability depend very much on the quality of the metadata. We aimed to evaluate the coverage and quality of this metadata from public metabolomics repositories.MethodsWe acquired an overview on the current reporting of chromatographic separation conditions. For this purpose, we defined the following information as important details that have to be provided: column name and dimension, flow rate, temperature, composition of eluents and gradient.ResultsWe found that 70% of descriptions of the chromatographic setups are incomplete (according to our definition) and an additional 10% of the descriptions contained ambiguous and/or incorrect information. Accordingly, only about 20% of the descriptions allow further (re-)use of the data, e.g. for RT prediction. Therefore, we have started to develop a unified and standardized notation for chromatographic metadata with detailed and specific description of eluents, columns and gradients.ConclusionReporting of chromatographic metadata is currently not unified. Our recommended suggestions for metadata reporting will enable more standardization and automatization in future reporting.