Abstract

THE geometrical and electronic requirements of replacement reactions designated SN2, SN1 and SNi were described by Ingold and Hughes on the basis of kinetics and changes in optical rotation1. Recent work2,3, however, has shown the need for caution in the practice which afterwards became fashionable of assigning these classifications on the basis of the optical result, unsupported by kinetic data, in other types of reaction, such as replacement of hydroxyl by halogen. The only unequivocal decision in such a reaction would seem to be the assignment of the exclusive SN2 process to account for the isolation of, for example, optically pure (−)-2-chloro-octane from (+)-2-octanol. Isolation of the optically pure (+)-halide, retained configuration, does not necessarily point to the SNi, internal, mechanism, since this result could be due to a double SN2 process, the first one being independent of halogen. Predominant inversion but with some loss in optical purity could be due to (SN2 + SN1 + SNi) or (SN2 + SN1) or (SN2 + SNi), whereas predominant retention could be due to (SN2 + SNi + SN1) or (SN1 + SNi) or (SN2 + SNi), bearing in mind that the effect ascribed to SNi could be due entirely or partly to the double SN2.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call