Abstract

Based on ICAO recommendations and statistics on aviation events and incidents during air traffic control, a spectrum of characteristic errors of n = 21 air traffic controllers was generated, which most fully and comprehensively illustrates their erroneous decisions. To establish the coefficients, a mathematical method of ranking priorities was applied. To summarize the views of m = 37 professional air traffic controllers involved in the experiment, regarding the frequency and hazards of errors identified in the ICAO scale, a multiplicative approach was implemented. It has been founded that the error’ rate indistinguishability indicator in a group system of preferences is equal \( R_{LF}^{*} = 1,23 \cdot 10^{ - 2} \), and the error’ danger indistinguishability indicator is three times worse and equal \( R_{LD}^{*} = 3,77 \cdot 10^{ - 2} \). Integrative (holistic) indicator of each error’ significance summarizes its significance coefficients in terms of frequency and hazards and is multiplicative. That allowed building the final group system of preferences. The degree of indistinguishability of the errors significance is equal \( R_{g}^{*} = 0,91 \cdot 10^{ - 2} \), which testifies to the effectiveness of the proposed approach to the implementation of ICAO recommendations regarding the frequency and the dangers of unwanted events in flight safety management.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.