Abstract

Regionally recurrent and P-regionally recurrent flows are characterized in purely prolongational notions. An example is given to show that the condition z E J(z) is not, as many authors asserted, equivalent to regional recurrence. Introduction. Let (X, T) be a flow, where X is a topological space and T is a topological group. Then a point x E X is said to be T-regionally recurrent or simply regionally recurrent if for each neighbourhood U of x there exists an extensive subset A of T such that U n Ua $ 0 for all a E A [6]. In [3] the author showed that for a flow (X, T), a point x E X is regionally recurrent if and only if x E JP(x) for all replete semigroups P in T. An example is provided (Example 14) to show that the condition x E J(x) is not equivalent to regional recurrence as it was stated in [7] and [8]. However, in the setting of continuous flows, where the phase group is the additive group of real numbers R, a necessary and a sufficient condition for a point x E X to be regionally recurrent is either one of the following (1) x E J+(x) or, (2) x E J-(x) or (3) x E J(x). This is due to the simple structure of replete semigroups in R. Every replete semigroup in R contains either a ray in R+ or a ray in R-. Thus if x E J+(x), then x E JP(x) for all replete semigroups P in R+. Furthermore, x E J+(x) implies that x E J-(x). Consequently, x E JQ(x) for all replete semigroups Q in Rand hence x is regionally recurrent. Similar analysis is available for the cases x E J-(x) and x E J(x). The situation is far more complicated in general flows as is shown in Example 14. In this example we have x E J(x) for each x E X but x ? JQ(x) for some replete semigroups Q in the phase group T. In [3] it was shown that x E X is P-regionally recurrent iff it is P-nonwandering. The same conclusion holds for T-regionally recurrent and T-nonwandering. Hence, the work here is a natural generalization of the work in [1] on nonwandering continuous flows. However, our techniques are different and much simpler. In addition to the above-mentioned, one purpose of this note is to introduce prolongational techniques which are widely used in Dynamical Systems Theory but surprisingly unknown in the theory of Topological Dynamics. As far as I know it was Hajek [7] who suggested the use of prolongational techniques in Topological Dynamics. R. Knight [8, 9] and Elaydi [2-5], with Kaul followed suit. But the power of these techniques has yet to be shown. Our main references for notations and terminology are [7] and [3]. Received by the editors April 6, 1981 and, in revised form, September 20, 1981. 1980 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 54H20.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call