Abstract
The identification of the robust clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated endonuclease (Cas9) system gene-editing tool has opened up a wide range of potential therapeutic applications that were restricted by more complex tools, including zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Nevertheless, the high frequency of CRISPR system off-target activity still limits its applications, and, thus, advanced strategies for highly specific CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing are continuously under development including CRISPR–FokI dead Cas9 (fdCas9). fdCas9 system is derived from linking a FokI endonuclease catalytic domain to an inactive Cas9 protein and requires a pair of guide sgRNAs that bind to the sense and antisense strands of the DNA in a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)-out orientation, with a defined spacer sequence range around the target site. The dimerization of FokI domains generates DNA double-strand breaks, which activates the DNA repair machinery and results in genomic edit. So far, all the engineered fdCas9 variants have shown promising gene-editing activities in human cells when compared to other platforms. Herein, we review the advantages of all published variants of fdCas9 and their current applications in genome engineering.
Highlights
Genome engineering has been applied to different types of cells and organisms and is used as an essential tool in biological and biomedical research [1]
There are two main DNA repair pathways stimulated by DNA editing tools: (i) homology-directed repair (HDR) and (ii) canonical nonhomologous end-joining (c-NHEJ) [2]
The trend of favoring c-NHEJ machinery over HDR is common to most gene-editing tools because it occurs independent of the cell cycle stage, unlike HDR, which is limited to the S/G2 phase [3]
Summary
Genome engineering has been applied to different types of cells and organisms and is used as an essential tool in biological and biomedical research [1]. The three commonly used nuclease-based genome engineering tools are (i) the zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), (ii) the transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and (iii) the clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated endonuclease (Cas9) system [11,12]. These nuclease-based systems can create undesired off-target effects, and, identifying new genome engineering tools that minimize these effects are needed [4,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. + 17–20 bp Recognizes two NGG PAM sequences + 38–40 bp Tolerates both positional and multiple consecutive mismatches
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.