Abstract

We consider weighted tree automata (wta) over strong bimonoids and their initial algebra semantics and their run semantics. There are wta for which these semantics are different; however, for bottom-up deterministic wta and for wta over semirings, the difference vanishes. A wta is crisp-deterministic if it is bottom-up deterministic and each transition is weighted by one of the unit elements of the strong bimonoid. We prove that the class of weighted tree languages recognized by crisp-deterministic wta is the same as the class of recognizable step mappings. Moreover, we investigate the following two crisp-determinization problems: for a given wta ${\cal A}$, (a) does there exist a crisp-deterministic wta which computes the initial algebra semantics of ${\cal A}$ and (b) does there exist a crisp-deterministic wta which computes the run semantics of ${\cal A}$? We show that the finiteness of the Nerode algebra ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ of ${\cal A}$ implies a positive answer for (a), and that the finite order property of ${\cal A}$ implies a positive answer for (b). We show a sufficient condition which guarantees the finiteness of ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ and a sufficient condition which guarantees the finite order property of ${\cal A}$. Also, we provide an algorithm for the construction of the crisp-deterministic wta according to (a) if ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ is finite, and similarly for (b) if ${\cal A}$ has finite order property. We prove that it is undecidable whether an arbitrary wta ${\cal A}$ is crisp-determinizable. We also prove that both, the finiteness of ${\cal N}({\cal A})$ and the finite order property of ${\cal A}$ are undecidable.

Highlights

  • The determinization problem shows up if one wants to specify a problem in a nondeterministic way and to calculate its solution in a deterministic way

  • It is well known that the determinization problem is solved positively if T is the class of all finite-state automata, i.e., for each nondeterministic finite-state automaton A

  • The same holds true for the class T of all finite-state tree automata [TW68, Thm. 1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The determinization problem shows up if one wants to specify a problem (e.g., a formal language) in a nondeterministic way and to calculate its solution (e.g., membership) in a deterministic way. There exists a wsa such that there is no equivalent deterministic wsa (see, e.g., [BV03, Lm. 6.3] for a weighted tree automaton over a monadic alphabet with this property)(i) On the other side, there are subclasses of T for which the determinization problem can be solved positively: the subclass of all wsa over locally finite semirings [KM05, p. We will follow the lines of [CDIV10] and identify subclasses of T for which the crisp-determinization problem is solvable, i.e., for every wta A of that subclass, there exists a crisp-deterministic wta B such that A and B are i-equivalent, i.e., A and B have the same initial algebra semantics, and B can be constructed effectively. In this paper we show that for arbitrary wta A it is undecidable whether im(hV(A)) is finite By restricting this result to the case of monadic input trees (i.e., strings), we have solved partially the open problem stated in [CDIV10, Sect. An arbitrary bottom-up deterministic wta is crisp-determinizable (Theorem 8.5), for an arbitrary bottom-up deterministic wta, its Nerode algebra is finite (Theorem 8.7), and an arbitrary bottom-up deterministic wta has the finite order property (Theorem 8.9)

Basic concepts
Trees and tree languages
Algebraic structures
Weighted tree languages
The model
Examples
Algebras with root weights
General concepts
Direct product of algebras with root-weight vector
Crisp-deterministic weighted tree automata
Crisp-determinization for the initial algebra semantics
Finiteness of the Nerode algebra implies crisp-determinization
Properties of the Nerode algebra
Crisp-determinization for the run semantics
Finite order property implies crisp-determinization
Undecidability results
Mealy machines and their simulation by weighted tree automata
Undecidability of crisp-determinization under initial algebra semantics
Undecidability of finiteness of Nerode algebras
Undecidability of finite order property
Undecidability for the string case
Open problems

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.