Crisis at the Croatian Medical Journal: Considering a Proposal for Its Destruction

In defence of why

In the News of the Week story, “Croatian editors fight with medical school over journal's fate” (18 April, p. [304][1]), G. Vogel's intention to remain neutral and objective was compromised, as she did not accept the invitation from the Rector of the University of Zagreb to visit and gain insight into the relevant documents. Hence, the story regarding the Croatian Medical Journal ( CMJ ) was predominantly based on opinions of the CMJ editors. The concluding message is that, given the relative success of the journal, its editors should be left alone to do their work. While we do agree that the CMJ has been a relatively successful journal, we believe that the ethical and legal responsibilities of its editors are not beyond the scope of evaluation and discussion. The problems of the editors were caused by their own actions, and not by the reputation of the CMJ . We do not agree with the statement by the Marusic's that “their troubles started in 2001 when the journal rejected a paper by a Zagreb colleague, based on unfavorable reviews.” According to our School's rules, even Ph.D. students cannot defend their doctoral thesis before publishing at least one research article in an international peer-reviewed journal with an impact factor above 1.0. However, the CMJ 's impact factor is around 0.8, and it has been declining. Thus, failure to publish in the CMJ could not “thwart careers” at the University of Zagreb, as suggested by Vogel. We also disagree with the suggestion that the Marusic's have played a pioneering role in bringing to light corruption and plagiarism in the Croatian academic community. They first raised accusations against colleagues only after Ana Marusic was charged with plagiarism and other forms of unethical conduct of research. Since then, Ana Marusic has received a public reprimand (according to our bylaws the mildest among ethical measures) from the School's Court of Honor, for plagiarism of Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy textbook for medical students (1992), after three independent, expert committees ascertained that she had deliberately translated substantial parts of the foreign textbook under her name ([1][2]–[4][3]). This was confirmed in a vote of the School's Council: 41 voted affirmative and 4 abstained. It was not a question of one (Croatian) publisher failing to obtain permission from another publisher (Williams & Wilkins), but the simple case of misappropriating 22 out of 26 tables and 30% of the with Moore's specific clinical examples without quoting the author. In addition, the Court of Honor considered Ana Marusic's actions to be even more reprehensible in light of the fact that she not only teaches anatomy but also presides over the Council of Science Editors and serves as co-editor of the CMJ ([4][3]). The fact that she is currently teaching academic integrity to our medical students is especially disturbing. Concurrently, Matko Marusic offended the entire academic and scientific community by accusing them of being corrupt without providing any evidence. This is the real background of the controversy between the CMJ 's editors (not the journal as such) and the Medical School of Zagreb, which has recently introduced rules for professional and ethical conduct of research and teaching quite similar to those practiced at the Yale University. We remain confident that the relative success of the CMJ as a journal cannot and should not be used as an excuse for nontransparent, questionable, and unethical actions by its editors. The main issue is not the editors' fight over the journal's fate, which has never been in question. Rather it is the editors' inappropriate and unacceptable behavior, which is continuously harming the academic community. 1. 1.[↵][4] Report No. 450/2006 of Expert Committee for evaluation of authorship of textbook Human Anatomy (24 October 2006). 2. 2. Report of Committee for Scientific Research of the Medical School (29 May 2007). 3. 3. Report of official court interpreter for English language, L. N. Zanella (12 October 2007). 4. 4.[↵][5] Decision of the Court of Honor at Medical School, University of Zagreb (12 December 2007). [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.320.5874.304a [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-4 [4]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1. in text [5]: #xref-ref-4-1 View reference 4. in text

Happy 25th Anniversary, EurJOC!

The International American Journal of Ophthalmology

Evolution and transformation of JVS-CIT

JID Innovations and Peer Review

IntroductionEach journal’s editorial and advisory board plays a critical role in resolving gender bias in the peer-review and publication process. Thus, this study aimed to quantify women’s participation in editorial and advisory boards of major dental journals. Gender data on editorial and advisory boards were extracted from major dental journals, which were then categorized by journal specialty focus. The gender of the editor-in-chief and associate editor-in-chief was noted to assess the effect of journal leadership on women’s participation in journal boards. For comparison purposes, data were also obtained regarding the percentage of women faculty for each dental specialty.ResultsOverall, in the major 69 dental journals, 14.8% of editorial board members were women. An one-way ANOVA analysis revealed statistically significant gender differences between journal specialty categories (p = 0.003) with some dental specialties’ journals demonstrating a relatively high participation of women as editorial board members. There was a significant positive correlation for various dental specialties between women’s representation in editorial and advisory boards and women in similar dental academic specialties (p = 0.02, r2 = 0.55). Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between the presence of women in journal editorial leadership and the percentage of women serving as advisory board members (p = 0.03). Our results confirmed that the under-representation of women on dental journal editorial boards was significantly different between dental science specialties. When there were more women in journal editorial leadership positions, there was a higher participation of women as editorial and advisory board members. Journals should increase the numbers of women on editorial boards in order to secure diversity, improve publication quality and recognize women’s contribution to dental science.

Peer Review: The Best of the Blemished?

The American Journal of Psychiatry Residents' Journal: Training the Next Generation of Academic Psychiatrists.

To take or not to take?

Journal Performance Report for 2007

Editorial introductions

Current Opinion in Psychiatry was launched in 1988. It is one of a successful series of review journals whose unique format is designed to provide a systematic and critical assessment of the literature as presented in the many primary journals. The field of psychiatry is divided into 13 sections that are reviewed once a year. Each section is assigned a Section Editor, a leading authority in the area, who identifies the most important topics at that time. Here we are pleased to introduce the Journal's Editors and Section Editors for this issue. EDITORS David J. KupferDavid J. KupferDavid J. Kupfer, MD, Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA, received his bachelor's (magna cum laude) and MD degrees from Yale University, USA. Following completion of an internship, Dr Kupfer continued his postgraduate clinical and research training at the Yale New Haven Hospital and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), USA. In 1970, he was appointed Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at Yale University School of Medicine. Dr Kupfer joined the faculty at the University of Pittsburgh, USA, in 1973 as Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Director of Research and Research Training at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic. He was promoted to Professor of Psychiatry in 1975. Between 1983 and 2009, Dr Kupfer served as Chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and Director of Research at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic. During that time, he facilitated the coordination and expansion of investigations among the department's 200 faculty. Under Dr Kupfer's direction, WPIC became one of the nation's preeminent university-based psychiatric research centers as evidenced by the quality and number of publications as well as the amount of peer-reviewed federal funding for mental health research. A prolific writer, Dr Kupfer has authored or co-authored a combination of more than 1000 articles, books, and book chapters. Dr Kupfer's own research has focused primarily on long-term treatment strategies for recurrent mood disorders, the pathogenesis of depression, and the relationship between biomarkers and depression. In recognition of his contributions to the field, Dr Kupfer has been the recipient of numerous awards and honors including the A.E. Bennett Research Award in Clinical Science (1975), the Anna-Monika Foundation Prize (1977), the Daniel H. Efron Award (1979), the Twenty-Sixth Annual Award of the Institute of Pennsylvania Hospital in Memory of Edward A. Strecker, M.D. (1989), the 1993 American Psychiatric Association Award for Research in Psychiatry, the 1996 Gerald L. Klerman Lifetime Research Award (jointly with Dr Ellen Frank), the Institute of Medicine's 1998 Rhoda and Bernard Sarnat International Prize in Mental Health, and the 2009 C. Charles Burlingame Award. He was the 2010 Litchfield lecturer at the Department of Psychiatry at Oxford University, UK, and the recipient of the 2010 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology Julius Axelrod Mentorship Award. Dr Kupfer was elected to the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences in 1990. He is the Founding President of the International Society of Bipolar Disorders. Dr Kupfer chaired the American Psychiatric Association Task Force for DSM-5. Norman SartoriusNorman SartoriusNorman Sartorius, MD PhD FRPsych, served as the Director of the Division of Mental Health of the World Health Organization for more than two decades and during that time led work on diagnosis and classification of mental disorders and conducted several major international studies on schizophrenia, on depression and on health service delivery. Subsequently, Dr Sartorius was elected president of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) and after that served as President of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA). Dr Sartorius holds professorial appointments at the University of London (UK), New York (USA), St Louis (USA), Zagreb (Croatia), Beijing (China), and at several other universities. He is a Senior Associate of the Faculty of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health in Baltimore, USA. He is the Chairperson of the Council of the World Psychiatric Association. Dr Sartorius has published more than 400 articles in scientific journals, wrote, co-authored or edited more than 100 books. Dr Sartorius is an Honorary Fellow of the Royal College of Psychiatrists of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and of the World Psychiatric Association, a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association, a Corresponding Member of the Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the Spanish Royal Academy of Medicine and a honorary member of the Medical Academies of Mexico, Peru and Croatia, a Doctor of Medicine Honoris Causa of the Universities of Umea (Sweden), Timisoara (Romania) and of Prague (Czech Republic), a Doctor of Science Honoris Causa of the University of Bath, UK, Doctor of Psychology Honoris Causa of Copenhagen University (Denmark). He has received the Mahidol Prize for Medicine, the Rema Lapouse Award of the American Public Health Association, the Burgholzli Award and the Harvard Award in Psychiatric Epidemiology. He is an honorary fellow or member of numerous professional associations and advisory boards, both national and international. He is also a member of editorial and advisory boards of many scientific journals. He speaks Croatian, English, French, German, Russian, and Spanish. SECTION EDITORS Sidney H. KennedySidney H. KennedyDr Sidney H. Kennedy is Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto, Director of the Centre for Depression & Suicide Studies, St. Michael's Hospital, and a Scientist at Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute and Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. Dr Kennedy is the lead investigator for a large depression biomarker initiative, the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND). He has published extensively on new drug evaluation, neuroimaging and neurostimulation therapies, personality factors in depression, antidepressant effects on sexual function and treatment guidelines for Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. Dr Kennedy is the founding chair of the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and co-lead in Guidelines for MDD and Bipolar Disorder. He has published more than 400 peer reviewed publications and 11 books on depression and related topics. Hans-Ulrich WittchenHans-Ulrich WittchenProfessor Hans-Ulrich Wittchen is Chairman of the Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy and the Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Longitudinal Studies (CELOS) at the Technische Universitaet Dresden, Germany. He is also Honorary Professor at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) in Munich, Germany, the Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA, and Consultant to the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany. Trained in medicine and psychology at the University of Vienna, Austria, he received his PhD in clinical psychology in 1975 and his habilitation (Dr phil. habil.) in 1983 at the LMU. He worked in several clinical research positions at the Anton Proksch and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Addiction Research (Vienna, Austria), the Central Institute of Mental Health and the University of Mannheim, (Mannheim, Germany), the World Health Organization (Geneva, Switzerland), the NIMH (Bethesda, USA) and the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (Head Clinical Epidemiology 1980–1990, and Director Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology Department 1990–2000). Dr Wittchen's research combines in a unique way the psychological sciences and neuroscience with epidemiological approaches as a “cornerstone methodology” in the field of disorders of the brain, with emphasis on the developmental pathways of anxiety, depressive substance use disorders as well as neurological and somatic disease. Major contributions to the field are particularly his studies on the size, the burden and the cost of disorders of the brain, “symptom progression and comorbidity models”, and the development of widely used novel diagnostic tools for mental disorders as well as somatic disease and neurological disorders. He also made major contributions to treatment and translational research with emphasis on innovative cognitive-behavioural interventions and the neuropsychological mechanisms of action. He is and has been PI and Co-PI of numerous national and international large-scale clinical consortia on the prevalence, incidence risk factors, course and outcomes of mental and substance use disorders (EDSP; NGS, DEGS, WMH) as well as treatment and intervention studies. Professor Wittchen received several awards and honours such as the Medvantis Research Award 2005. He served for many years as member of the ECNP Executive Committee (vice-president) and is member of several Advisory and Steering Committees (e.g. European Brain Council). He has published more than 750 peer review articles ranking (ISIhighlycited.com) among the top 100 most highly cited researchers in psychology/psychiatry/neurosciences. He is editor or on the editorial board of several peer review journals (e.g. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Psychological Medicine, Addiction, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Behavioural Psychotherapy) and is author of many books and diagnostic instruments on mental and substance use disorders. Aleksandar JancaAleksandar JancaDr Aleksandar Janca is Winthrop Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Western Australia. He also works as a Consultant Psychiatrist at Osborne Park Hospital and is Director of the WHO Collaborating Centre in Perth. Dr Janca currently holds adjunct professorial appointments at the Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, USA, and University of Novi Sad in Novi Sad, Serbia. Dr Janca finished his medical studies and specialist training in psychiatry and neurology in Yugoslavia. He started his international research career in 1987 as a Fulbright Scholar at the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri. From 1991 to 1997 he worked as a Medical Officer at WHO Headquarters in Geneva and was responsible for coordination of a number of international research projects in the areas of psychiatric epidemiology; transcultural psychiatry; diagnosis, classification and assessment of mental disorders; and public health aspects of mental and neurological disorders. Dr Janca is an Individual Member of the World Psychiatric Association and Fellow of the British Royal College of Psychiatrists, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, American Psychiatric Association and a number of other national and international professional organisations. Dr Janca's publication record comprises over 200 journal papers, books, book chapters, WHO documents and psychiatric assessment instruments. Charles B. PullCharles B. PullCharles B. Pull trained in France where he obtained a degree in Psychiatry as well as in Psychology from the University of Paris, France. He is a founding member and a Fellow of the Association of European Psychiatrists. He was the Secretary General of the association from1984 to 2000. He is presently an Associate Professor at the University of Luxembourg, and an invited Professor at the University Liège, Belgium. He also holds teaching appointments with the Universities of Lyon, France, and Vienna, Austria. He is Chief of the Clinique des Troubles Emotionnels at the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg and Head of the Laboratoire des Troubles Emotionnels at the Centre de Recherche Public Santé in Luxembourg. He is an Expert of the World Health Organization and has worked extensively with the Division of Mental Health of WHO under Professor Norman Sartorius. He is one of the authors of the chapter on Mental Disorders of the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases or ICD-10. He coordinated the field trials of ICD-10 in French-speaking countries, and supervised the translation of ICD-10 into French. He has also been an advisor for DSM-IV, and was one of the chief translators into French of DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and the current DSM-IV-TR. He contributed in the elaboration of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview or CIDI, the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry or SCAN, the International Personality Disorder Examination or IPDE, and the second version of the Disability Assessment Schedule or DAS-II, and headed the translation of those instruments into French. Charles Pull is the author of over 200 scientific articles. Most of his research has involved work in the fields of nosology, classification, and assessment instruments. His current research projects include: the assessment of handicap and quality of life in anxiety disorders and eating disorders; a comparison of the efficacy between cognitive behavioural psychotherapy and virtual reality in specific phobias, including fear of driving and fear of flying; and the psychiatric and psychological assessment of subjects with morbid obesity presenting for obesity surgery.

Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy