Abstract

One of the preferred explanations of the current crisis is the sophistication and the weak transparency of financial markets which would have allowed speculative behaviors to elude authorities, supervision. This article develops a different view by putting the emphasis on the model of organization of financial systems which is established, since the 1980-90s, on the predominance of micro-prudential supervision schemes following the hypothesis of free market efficiency. We show that this orientation suffers from the fallacy of composition ; the microprudential model turns out unsuitable for the management of systemic risks because of the absence of an automatic bridge between the micro and the macroeconomic levels. The new regulatory environment feeds successive bubbles the recurrent crises of which seem to require a modification of the rules of organization to avoid the forced socialization of the losses of private actors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call